You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ctakes.apache.org by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> on 2012/09/25 23:13:38 UTC
cTAKES assertion Lucene version
Hi,
I was updating the assertion module to use the maven dependencies, but was getting the below exception when using lucene core 3.5.0 from the parent which seems to be used by the other modules.
Does anyone recall which version of Lucene does the featureFile11b should use? Is this as simple as rebuilding the index or something more involved???
9/25/12 5:08:35 PM - 10: org.mitre.medfacts.i2b2.cli.BatchRunner.loadEnabledFeaturesFromFile: INFO: opening enabled features file: \ctakes\ctakes-assertion\resources\org\mitre\medfacts\resources\featureFile11b
9/25/12 5:08:46 PM - 10: org.apache.uima.tools.cvd.MainFrame.handleException(527): SEVERE: Exception occurred
org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceInitializationException
at org.apache.ctakes.core.resource.LuceneIndexReaderResourceImpl.load(LuceneIndexReaderResourceImpl.java:79)
...
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format version is not supported (resource: ChecksumIndexInput(RAMInputStream(name=segments))): 20988 (needs to be between -1 and -11). This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 1.9 and later.
at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:275)
Thanks,
Pei
Re: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
Posted by Steven Bethard <st...@Colorado.EDU>.
On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:13 PM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> I was updating the assertion module to use the maven dependencies, but was getting the below exception when using lucene core 3.5.0 from the parent which seems to be used by the other modules.
> Does anyone recall which version of Lucene does the featureFile11b should use? Is this as simple as rebuilding the index or something more involved???
I remember running into a similar problem. I think I got it working with something like Lucene 3.0.0.
But a big +1 on rebuilding all the indexes with a recent version of Lucene, e.g. 3.6.1 or 4.0.0-BETA. My experience with Lucene is that the longer you put off an upgrade the harder it gets to migrate your code to something that's still supported.
Steve
RE: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
The Orange Book index was built a long time ago using an old version of lucene.
Jira CTAKES-38 is open regarding updating to a newer version of the Orange Book.
I'll upate that issue to indicate that doing that will also fix the problem with the index having been created with too old of a version of Lucene.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-438-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-438-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Kusenda, Brandyn J
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:06 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
>
> FYI: I received the same error when loading the OrangeBook index.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Coarr, Matt [mcoarr@mitre.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:53 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
>
> The lucene message isn't from the assertion module (we aren't using
> lucene).
>
> The first log statement is from the assertion module (at 5:05:35 PM). The
> second one is not (at 5:08:46 PM).
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 2012-09-25 17:13 , "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I was updating the assertion module to use the maven dependencies, but
> >was getting the below exception when using lucene core 3.5.0 from the
> >parent which seems to be used by the other modules.
> >Does anyone recall which version of Lucene does the featureFile11b
> >should use? Is this as simple as rebuilding the index or something
> >more involved???
> >
> >9/25/12 5:08:35 PM - 10:
> >org.mitre.medfacts.i2b2.cli.BatchRunner.loadEnabledFeaturesFromFile:
> >INFO: opening enabled features file:
> >\ctakes\ctakes-assertion\resources\org\mitre\medfacts\resources\feature
> >Fil
> >e11b
> >9/25/12 5:08:46 PM - 10:
> >org.apache.uima.tools.cvd.MainFrame.handleException(527): SEVERE:
> >Exception occurred
> >org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceInitializationException
> > at
> >org.apache.ctakes.core.resource.LuceneIndexReaderResourceImpl.load(Luce
> >neI
> >ndexReaderResourceImpl.java:79)
> >...
> >Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format
> >version is not supported (resource:
> >ChecksumIndexInput(RAMInputStream(name=segments))): 20988 (needs to be
> >between -1 and -11). This version of Lucene only supports indexes
> >created with release 1.9 and later.
> > at
> >org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:275)
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Pei
> >
RE: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
Posted by "Kusenda, Brandyn J" <br...@uiowa.edu>.
FYI: I received the same error when loading the OrangeBook index.
________________________________________
From: Coarr, Matt [mcoarr@mitre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:53 AM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
The lucene message isn't from the assertion module (we aren't using
lucene).
The first log statement is from the assertion module (at 5:05:35 PM). The
second one is not (at 5:08:46 PM).
Matt
On 2012-09-25 17:13 , "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Hi,
>I was updating the assertion module to use the maven dependencies, but
>was getting the below exception when using lucene core 3.5.0 from the
>parent which seems to be used by the other modules.
>Does anyone recall which version of Lucene does the featureFile11b should
>use? Is this as simple as rebuilding the index or something more
>involved???
>
>9/25/12 5:08:35 PM - 10:
>org.mitre.medfacts.i2b2.cli.BatchRunner.loadEnabledFeaturesFromFile:
>INFO: opening enabled features file:
>\ctakes\ctakes-assertion\resources\org\mitre\medfacts\resources\featureFil
>e11b
>9/25/12 5:08:46 PM - 10:
>org.apache.uima.tools.cvd.MainFrame.handleException(527): SEVERE:
>Exception occurred
>org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceInitializationException
> at
>org.apache.ctakes.core.resource.LuceneIndexReaderResourceImpl.load(LuceneI
>ndexReaderResourceImpl.java:79)
>...
>Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format
>version is not supported (resource:
>ChecksumIndexInput(RAMInputStream(name=segments))): 20988 (needs to be
>between -1 and -11). This version of Lucene only supports indexes created
>with release 1.9 and later.
> at
>org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:275)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Pei
>
Re: cTAKES assertion Lucene version
Posted by "Coarr, Matt" <mc...@mitre.org>.
The lucene message isn't from the assertion module (we aren't using
lucene).
The first log statement is from the assertion module (at 5:05:35 PM). The
second one is not (at 5:08:46 PM).
Matt
On 2012-09-25 17:13 , "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Hi,
>I was updating the assertion module to use the maven dependencies, but
>was getting the below exception when using lucene core 3.5.0 from the
>parent which seems to be used by the other modules.
>Does anyone recall which version of Lucene does the featureFile11b should
>use? Is this as simple as rebuilding the index or something more
>involved???
>
>9/25/12 5:08:35 PM - 10:
>org.mitre.medfacts.i2b2.cli.BatchRunner.loadEnabledFeaturesFromFile:
>INFO: opening enabled features file:
>\ctakes\ctakes-assertion\resources\org\mitre\medfacts\resources\featureFil
>e11b
>9/25/12 5:08:46 PM - 10:
>org.apache.uima.tools.cvd.MainFrame.handleException(527): SEVERE:
>Exception occurred
>org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceInitializationException
> at
>org.apache.ctakes.core.resource.LuceneIndexReaderResourceImpl.load(LuceneI
>ndexReaderResourceImpl.java:79)
>...
>Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format
>version is not supported (resource:
>ChecksumIndexInput(RAMInputStream(name=segments))): 20988 (needs to be
>between -1 and -11). This version of Lucene only supports indexes created
>with release 1.9 and later.
> at
>org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:275)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Pei
>