You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Steven A Rowe <sa...@syr.edu> on 2008/01/18 16:40:52 UTC
Parent POM template: 2004 ?
The documentation for the <inceptionYear> tag in http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd says:
The year of the project's inception, specified with 4 digits.
This value is used when generating copyright notices as well
as being informational.
CHANGES.txt indicates that Lucene's first open source release (v0.01) was in 2000.
Shouldn't this be changed to <inceptionYear>2000</inceptionYear> ?
Steve
Re: Parent POM template: 2004 ?
Posted by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com>.
Michael Busch wrote:
>>
>
> Right. Hmm, I don't see any releases older than 1.4.3 (2004) in the
> Apache release archives.
>
> Lucene was renamed from Jakarta Lucene to Apache Lucene and became a top
> level project in 2005.
>
> Anyway, I'm fine with changing it to 2000. Any objections?
>
OK I changed inceptionYear to 2000 in trunk & 2.3 branch.
-Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Parent POM template: 2004 ?
Posted by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com>.
Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> From CHANGES.txt:
>
> -------
> 1.2 RC1 (first Apache release), 2 October 2001:
> -------
>
Right. Hmm, I don't see any releases older than 1.4.3 (2004) in the
Apache release archives.
Lucene was renamed from Jakarta Lucene to Apache Lucene and became a top
level project in 2005.
Anyway, I'm fine with changing it to 2000. Any objections?
-Michael
> I suppose that the name shifts from Lucene -> Jakarta Lucene -> Apache Lucene could be viewed as inceptions of identity, but I'd need more convincing to think that they were project inceptions (can a project have more than one???), so my vote is still for 2000.
>
> Steve
>
> On 01/18/2008 at 2:03 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>> The documentation for the <inceptionYear> tag in
>>> http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd says:
>>>
>>> The year of the project's inception, specified with 4 digits.
>>> This value is used when generating copyright notices as well
>>> as being informational.
>>>
>>> CHANGES.txt indicates that Lucene's first open source release (v0.01)
>>> was in 2000.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be changed to <inceptionYear>2000</inceptionYear> ?
>>>
>>> Steve
>>
>> I think the first *Apache* release of Lucene Java was in 2004, so I
>> think it's ok if we don't change <inceptionYear>2004</inceptionYear>?
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
>> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: Parent POM template: 2004 ?
Posted by Steven A Rowe <sa...@syr.edu>.
Hi Michael,
From CHANGES.txt:
-------
1.2 RC1 (first Apache release), 2 October 2001:
-------
I suppose that the name shifts from Lucene -> Jakarta Lucene -> Apache Lucene could be viewed as inceptions of identity, but I'd need more convincing to think that they were project inceptions (can a project have more than one???), so my vote is still for 2000.
Steve
On 01/18/2008 at 2:03 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> Steven A Rowe wrote:
> > The documentation for the <inceptionYear> tag in
> > http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd says:
> >
> > The year of the project's inception, specified with 4 digits.
> > This value is used when generating copyright notices as well
> > as being informational.
> >
> > CHANGES.txt indicates that Lucene's first open source release (v0.01)
> > was in 2000.
> >
> > Shouldn't this be changed to <inceptionYear>2000</inceptionYear> ?
> >
> > Steve
>
>
> I think the first *Apache* release of Lucene Java was in 2004, so I
> think it's ok if we don't change <inceptionYear>2004</inceptionYear>?
>
> -Michael
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Parent POM template: 2004 ?
Posted by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com>.
Steven A Rowe wrote:
> The documentation for the <inceptionYear> tag in http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd says:
>
> The year of the project's inception, specified with 4 digits.
> This value is used when generating copyright notices as well
> as being informational.
>
> CHANGES.txt indicates that Lucene's first open source release (v0.01) was in 2000.
>
> Shouldn't this be changed to <inceptionYear>2000</inceptionYear> ?
>
> Steve
I think the first *Apache* release of Lucene Java was in 2004, so I
think it's ok if we don't change <inceptionYear>2004</inceptionYear>?
-Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org