[GitHub] [jmeter] kirillyu commented on pull request #678: DSL for programmatic test plan generation

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

kirillyu commented on pull request #678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/678#issuecomment-976298525


   Initially - thanks for the idea, this is really what the community needs.
    
   My opinion on current issues:
   1. I am inclined more to the idea that an intermediate presentation is needed than not.  
   2. Can you give details on this?  I don't see any clear advantage in using no-result functions.  
   3. This is an interesting point.  In my opinion there is no need to escape this character.  It should also be used as part of the string, and replace will happen in the jmeter engine.  In other cases, the variables must be taken from the context in the vars.get style.  
   4. name-less with a description is better, it is faster and takes up less space.  
   5. Yes, using .children () is more convenient for implementing custom builders.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org