You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> on 2013/05/02 07:54:56 UTC

Re: What's the current status on sparql 1.1?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Minto van der Sluis <mi...@xup.nl> wrote:

> Seems like QueryableTcProvider is already present, but not yet used.
> Have other part already been implemented as well? Shouldn't work like
> this, due to its intrusive nature, be done in a separate branch?
>

I assumed this might be feasible in an incremental way so that it would not
be so intrusive. A branch is needed when one wants to commit an
intermediate version that's not yet be regression free.

Cheers,
Reto