You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> on 2022/07/12 06:31:48 UTC
[VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Hi, RocketMQ Community,
As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
to enter the voting process.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Best Regards!
Lizhibo
links:
English proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing>
Chinese proposal:
https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by tiger lee <ti...@apache.org>.
+1
zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
> RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Lizhibo
>
>
>
> links:
>
> English proposal:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> >
>
> Chinese proposal:
> https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
>
Re:[VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by ShannonDing <di...@apache.org>.
+1
At 2022-07-12 14:31:48, "zhibo li" <os...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
>RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
>willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
>to enter the voting process.
>
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
>votes are reached.
>
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
>Best Regards!
>
>Lizhibo
>
>
>
>links:
>
>English proposal:
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>Chinese proposal:
>https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by zhibo li <os...@gmail.com>.
@dongeforever, Replicator 2.0 mainly focus on at least once delivery
semantics. Offset in source cluster is different from offset destination
cluster, it's hard to implement, we can fulfill it in the future.
dongeforever <do...@apache.org> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:44写道：
> +1.
>
> BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets.
>
> zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
>
> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >
> > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
> > RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
> > willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email
> thread
> > to enter the voting process.
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > Lizhibo
> >
> >
> >
> > links:
> >
> > English proposal:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> >
> > Chinese proposal:
> > https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
> >
>
Re: Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by 周波 <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org> 于2022年7月12日周二 16:47写道：
> +1
> 在 2022-07-12 15:19:14，"heng du" <du...@apache.org> 写道：
> >+1
> >
> >dongeforever <do...@apache.org> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:44写道：
> >
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets.
> >>
> >> zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
> >>
> >> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to
> enhance
> >> > RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever
> are
> >> > willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email
> >> thread
> >> > to enter the voting process.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary
> number
> >> of
> >> > votes are reached.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please vote accordingly:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> >
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards!
> >> >
> >> > Lizhibo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > links:
> >> >
> >> > English proposal:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> >> > <
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Chinese proposal:
> >> > https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
> >> >
> >>
>
Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org>.
+1
在 2022-07-12 15:19:14，"heng du" <du...@apache.org> 写道：
>+1
>
>dongeforever <do...@apache.org> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:44写道：
>
>> +1.
>>
>> BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets.
>>
>> zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
>>
>> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>> >
>> >
>> > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
>> > RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
>> > willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email
>> thread
>> > to enter the voting process.
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
>> of
>> > votes are reached.
>> >
>> >
>> > Please vote accordingly:
>> >
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> >
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best Regards!
>> >
>> > Lizhibo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > links:
>> >
>> > English proposal:
>> >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
>> > <
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
>> > >
>> >
>> > Chinese proposal:
>> > https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by heng du <du...@apache.org>.
+1
dongeforever <do...@apache.org> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:44写道：
> +1.
>
> BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets.
>
> zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
>
> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >
> > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
> > RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
> > willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email
> thread
> > to enter the voting process.
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > Lizhibo
> >
> >
> >
> > links:
> >
> > English proposal:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> >
> > Chinese proposal:
> > https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
> >
>
Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by dongeforever <do...@apache.org>.
+1.
BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets.
zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道：
> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
> RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Lizhibo
>
>
>
> links:
>
> English proposal:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> >
>
> Chinese proposal:
> https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
>
Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0
Posted by zhibo li <os...@gmail.com>.
English proposal link is error, refer to
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
zhibo li <os...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 14:31写道：
> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 45 to enhance
> RocketMQ Replicator. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Lizhibo
>
>
>
> links:
>
> English proposal:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_gd3ijNW38cHQTeI_iOUX9hg4n_RVGQDLnZxLMJr0lg/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tSJkor_3Js4NBaVA0UENGyM8Mh0SrRMXszRyI91hjJ8/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Chinese proposal:
> https://shimo.im/file-invite/3EMTZwcWNFh8NW4Vgj4dKtlmGJXK6/
>