[IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Are there any issues with using the old tomahawk with the new core?  I
recall someone explaining to me that there were.  This is important
b/c the release is out there now and we need to put this info in the
announcment in order to minimize confusion.  There was already one
question on the user list this morning.

Sean

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>]

On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I already answered the question earlier.

On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I thought but I couldn't find the email.  I've been a
> little busy lately ;-)

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.   :)

I didn't mean "I answered the question already -- quit asking!"

I meant "I also posted to the user list a few minutes ago and took
care of the user who was asking earlier "

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good!

regards,

Martin

On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > The classes that the old tomahawk depended on in the core no longer
> > exist -- they have been renamed to "shared_tomahawk" (or "shared_impl"
> > depending on your perspective.
> >
> > I already answered the question earlier.
>
> That's what I thought but I couldn't find the email.  I've been a
> little busy lately ;-)
>
> @Martin: Let's put this info in the release announcement then.
>
> @Everyone Else: Lets get cranking on a tomahawk release.
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

> Yes.
>
> The classes that the old tomahawk depended on in the core no longer
> exist -- they have been renamed to "shared_tomahawk" (or "shared_impl"
> depending on your perspective.
>
> I already answered the question earlier.

That's what I thought but I couldn't find the email.  I've been a
little busy lately ;-)

@Martin: Let's put this info in the release announcement then.

@Everyone Else: Lets get cranking on a tomahawk release.

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>]

I think our general answer to this question should be:

Before 1.1.2, tomahawk and core version must match.
For 1.1.2 and beyond, tomahawk and core do not need to match.

On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> The classes that the old tomahawk depended on in the core no longer
> exist -- they have been renamed to "shared_tomahawk" (or "shared_impl"
> depending on your perspective.
>
> I already answered the question earlier.
>
> On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any issues with using the old tomahawk with the new core?  I
> > recall someone explaining to me that there were.  This is important
> > b/c the release is out there now and we need to put this info in the
> > announcment in order to minimize confusion.  There was already one
> > question on the user list this morning.
> >
> > Sean
> >
>

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>]

Yes.

The classes that the old tomahawk depended on in the core no longer
exist -- they have been renamed to "shared_tomahawk" (or "shared_impl"
depending on your perspective.

I already answered the question earlier.

On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any issues with using the old tomahawk with the new core?  I
> recall someone explaining to me that there were.  This is important
> b/c the release is out there now and we need to put this info in the
> announcment in order to minimize confusion.  There was already one
> question on the user list this morning.
>
> Sean
>

Re: [IMPORTANT] MyFaces Core 1.1.2 and Tomahawk 1.1.1

[Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>]

Sean Schofield schrieb:
> Are there any issues with using the old tomahawk with the new core?  I
> recall someone explaining to me that there were.  This is important
> b/c the release is out there now and we need to put this info in the
> announcment in order to minimize confusion.  There was already one
> question on the user list this morning.
> 
Yes there are issues introduced by the refactoring of the commons
classes, some users already jumped onto the build and now having a hard
time to get everything up and running. Most of the problems the users
now have are now unresolved dependencies into the compile time
refactored packages from the source level.