You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airavata.apache.org by Pedro da Silveira <pe...@gmail.com> on 2013/01/31 02:59:23 UTC

One workflow running two Application Service

Hi Dev,

I created one workflow where it was calling two Application service, one at
time.
The first application service runs "pw.x" with 64 cores and the second runs
"ph.x" also with 64 cores.
My problem is that the location of the "ph.x" has to be same where "pw.x"
had ran before.

I noticed that one directory is created for each App service on Lonestar,
even though they are from the same workflow. Like in my example.

AppPhonon_Wed_Jan_30_20_22_13_CST_2013_39895e3b-d9a3-43ae-aba7-ef4abab0b959
AppZb3_Wed_Jan_30_20_11_53_CST_2013_6f2cfa93-b503-410f-ab14-2cb02b0ba15c


Is there anyway to run both Application Service in just one directory?


Thank you,


Pedro da Silveira

Re: One workflow running two Application Service

Posted by Raminder Singh <ra...@iu.edu>.
Thanks Pedro for bringing this. I agree, we need to support jobs to share the working folders in Airavata, at least jobs in same workflow. Application developers can make sure jobs are not overriding output of each other. I have similar use case for Dark energy survey project.  Thoughts? 

Thanks
Raminder

On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Pedro da Silveira wrote:

> Hi Dev,
> 
> I created one workflow where it was calling two Application service, one at
> time.
> The first application service runs "pw.x" with 64 cores and the second runs
> "ph.x" also with 64 cores.
> My problem is that the location of the "ph.x" has to be same where "pw.x"
> had ran before.
> 
> I noticed that one directory is created for each App service on Lonestar,
> even though they are from the same workflow. Like in my example.
> 
> AppPhonon_Wed_Jan_30_20_22_13_CST_2013_39895e3b-d9a3-43ae-aba7-ef4abab0b959
> AppZb3_Wed_Jan_30_20_11_53_CST_2013_6f2cfa93-b503-410f-ab14-2cb02b0ba15c
> 
> 
> Is there anyway to run both Application Service in just one directory?
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Pedro da Silveira