You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2023/02/03 05:53:55 UTC
Re: [apache/flume] Run failed: CodeQL - trunk (185b951)
These have been failing for quite a while now. Last I checked they were running out of disk space for logs. I see that the version of CodeQL is also out of support.
This has me back bringing up my intention to split Flume into multiple project repos. We have a few modules that really can’t be supported so we should move them out of the main build. By splitting up the project we will also make the build faster and the logs smaller.
Any objections to doing this?
Ralph
> On Feb 2, 2023, at 5:33 PM, Ralph Goers <no...@github.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> [apache/flume] CodeQL workflow run
>
>
>
> CodeQL: Some jobs were not successful
>
> View workflow run <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>
>
> CodeQL / Analyze (java)
> Failed in 4 minutes and 1 second
> 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>
> CodeQL / Analyze (python)
> Succeeded in 3 minutes and 31 seconds
> 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>
>
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Manage your GitHub Actions notifications <https://github.com/settings/notifications>
>
> GitHub, Inc. ・88 Colin P Kelly Jr Street ・San Francisco, CA 94107
>
Re: [apache/flume] Run failed: CodeQL - trunk (185b951)
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Yes, this was the proposal for 2.0. The topic was discussed last year in this thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread/8382s6v1x61scn3hvscyrhknfcww9g2t. There didn’t seem to be much disagreement, just questions.
Ralph
> On Feb 6, 2023, at 12:13 AM, Bessenyei Balázs Donát <be...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I vaguely remember this topic from before and I think there was some
> proposal regarding releases. Where did we end up on that?
>
>
> Donat
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:54 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com <ma...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>>
>> These have been failing for quite a while now. Last I checked they were running out of disk space for logs. I see that the version of CodeQL is also out of support.
>>
>> This has me back bringing up my intention to split Flume into multiple project repos. We have a few modules that really can’t be supported so we should move them out of the main build. By splitting up the project we will also make the build faster and the logs smaller.
>>
>> Any objections to doing this?
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 2, 2023, at 5:33 PM, Ralph Goers <no...@github.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [apache/flume] CodeQL workflow run
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CodeQL: Some jobs were not successful
>>>
>>> View workflow run <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>>>
>>>
>>> CodeQL / Analyze (java)
>>> Failed in 4 minutes and 1 second
>>> 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>>>
>>> CodeQL / Analyze (python)
>>> Succeeded in 3 minutes and 31 seconds
>>> 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —
>>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>>> Manage your GitHub Actions notifications <https://github.com/settings/notifications>
>>>
>>> GitHub, Inc. ・88 Colin P Kelly Jr Street ・San Francisco, CA 94107
Re: [apache/flume] Run failed: CodeQL - trunk (185b951)
Posted by Bessenyei Balázs Donát <be...@apache.org>.
I vaguely remember this topic from before and I think there was some
proposal regarding releases. Where did we end up on that?
Donat
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:54 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> These have been failing for quite a while now. Last I checked they were running out of disk space for logs. I see that the version of CodeQL is also out of support.
>
> This has me back bringing up my intention to split Flume into multiple project repos. We have a few modules that really can’t be supported so we should move them out of the main build. By splitting up the project we will also make the build faster and the logs smaller.
>
> Any objections to doing this?
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2023, at 5:33 PM, Ralph Goers <no...@github.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > [apache/flume] CodeQL workflow run
> >
> >
> >
> > CodeQL: Some jobs were not successful
> >
> > View workflow run <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
> >
> >
> > CodeQL / Analyze (java)
> > Failed in 4 minutes and 1 second
> > 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
> >
> > CodeQL / Analyze (python)
> > Succeeded in 3 minutes and 31 seconds
> > 4 <https://github.com/apache/flume/actions/runs/4079911629>
> >
> >
> >
> > —
> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> > Manage your GitHub Actions notifications <https://github.com/settings/notifications>
> >
> > GitHub, Inc. ・88 Colin P Kelly Jr Street ・San Francisco, CA 94107
> >
>