You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> on 2011/07/06 14:33:04 UTC

SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Hi,

See SLING-2127, our build currently fails with Maven 2.2.1.

We could probably work around the problem, but having a smaller range
of allowed Maven versions often makes things simpler.

Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?

-Bertrand

[1] patch:

Index: parent/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- parent/pom.xml	(revision 1143359)
+++ parent/pom.xml	(working copy)
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
     <url>http://sling.apache.org</url>

     <prerequisites>
-        <maven>2.2.1</maven>
+        <maven>3.0.0</maven>
     </prerequisites>

Re: SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Posted by Justin Edelson <ju...@justinedelson.com>.
+1 to require Maven 3

On Jul 6, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> See SLING-2127, our build currently fails with Maven 2.2.1.
> 
> We could probably work around the problem, but having a smaller range
> of allowed Maven versions often makes things simpler.
> 
> Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?
> 
> -Bertrand
> 
> [1] patch:
> 
> Index: parent/pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- parent/pom.xml    (revision 1143359)
> +++ parent/pom.xml    (working copy)
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>     <url>http://sling.apache.org</url>
> 
>     <prerequisites>
> -        <maven>2.2.1</maven>
> +        <maven>3.0.0</maven>
>     </prerequisites>

Re: SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
+1

I planned to do some additional changes to our parent pom in the next
days, so after that we can do a new release

Carsten


2011/7/6 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>:
> +1 also.
>
> On 6 July 2011 13:40, Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> +1 for Maven 3
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> See SLING-2127, our build currently fails with Maven 2.2.1.
>>>
>>> We could probably work around the problem, but having a smaller range
>>> of allowed Maven versions often makes things simpler.
>>>
>>> Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?
>>>
>>> -Bertrand
>>>
>>> [1] patch:
>>>
>>> Index: parent/pom.xml
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- parent/pom.xml    (revision 1143359)
>>> +++ parent/pom.xml    (working copy)
>>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>>>     <url>http://sling.apache.org</url>
>>>
>>>     <prerequisites>
>>> -        <maven>2.2.1</maven>
>>> +        <maven>3.0.0</maven>
>>>     </prerequisites>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Re: SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
+1 also.

On 6 July 2011 13:40, Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 for Maven 3
>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> See SLING-2127, our build currently fails with Maven 2.2.1.
>>
>> We could probably work around the problem, but having a smaller range
>> of allowed Maven versions often makes things simpler.
>>
>> Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>> [1] patch:
>>
>> Index: parent/pom.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- parent/pom.xml    (revision 1143359)
>> +++ parent/pom.xml    (working copy)
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>>     <url>http://sling.apache.org</url>
>>
>>     <prerequisites>
>> -        <maven>2.2.1</maven>
>> +        <maven>3.0.0</maven>
>>     </prerequisites>
>
>

Re: SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
+1 for Maven 3

On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> See SLING-2127, our build currently fails with Maven 2.2.1.
> 
> We could probably work around the problem, but having a smaller range
> of allowed Maven versions often makes things simpler.
> 
> Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?
> 
> -Bertrand
> 
> [1] patch:
> 
> Index: parent/pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- parent/pom.xml	(revision 1143359)
> +++ parent/pom.xml	(working copy)
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>     <url>http://sling.apache.org</url>
> 
>     <prerequisites>
> -        <maven>2.2.1</maven>
> +        <maven>3.0.0</maven>
>     </prerequisites>


Re: SLING-2127 - do we want to switch to Maven 3?

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bd...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...Is anyone opposed to requiring Maven 3.0.0 for our build [1]?...

Thanks for your replies, I have change the parent pom in revision 1143836.

-Bertrand