Re: [CLI] Some documentation at last

[Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>]

Upayavira wrote:

> I've just committed some documentation for the CLI..
>
> Points to note, in the page cli.html:
>
> <note>Whilst the xconf method provides access to more features, the 
> command line parameter method is more stable, as there are currently 
> plans to improve the xconf format to allow greater flexibility. If you 
> require a stable and          consistent method for accessing the CLI, 
> it is recommended that you use the command line parameter method.</note>


Add a note to the cli.xconf file itself too.


> And in bean.html:
>
> <note>Whilst the Cocoon Bean works, it is still under development, and 
> therefore its API  must be considered unstable. Return to this page in 
> future versions to see what has changed.</note>
>
> This is in preparation for the 2.1 final release. I have further ideas 
> about extending the CLI and bean, and want to make it clear where API 
> stability exists, and doesn't.
>
> Is this fair enough?


Ok

Vadim

Re: [CLI] Some documentation at last

[Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>]

On 7 Aug 2003 at 8:33, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Upayavira wrote:
> 
> > I've just committed some documentation for the CLI..
> >
> > Points to note, in the page cli.html:
> >
> > <note>Whilst the xconf method provides access to more features, the
> > command line parameter method is more stable, as there are currently
> > plans to improve the xconf format to allow greater flexibility. If
> > you require a stable and          consistent method for accessing
> > the CLI, it is recommended that you use the command line parameter
> > method.</note>
> 
> 
> Add a note to the cli.xconf file itself too.

Done. Thanks.

...

Upayavira