You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2016/03/09 19:40:46 UTC
LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Hi,
Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
hand-written JS files.
Thoughts?
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 9, 2016 10:41 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
> things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
> XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
> some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
> hand-written JS files.
>
+1 for a release before Apr 4th.
I am ready to release the FlexJS npm module on the npm site. It would be a
good exercise for me to release 0.5 right away and figure out the stuff
needed to release an update while things are fresh in my mind.
Thanks,
Om
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good to me! Another release will keep momentum going, and I have
some tutorials in the queue that will require 0.6.
In terms of features, I also added a Node backend, extending the JSC
backend, to output JavaScript for Node.js. It is accessible with the new
asnodec script in js/bin. The node.swc only contains the signature for
require() right now, but it's pretty cool, even without full typing of
every Node API.
- Josh
On Mar 9, 2016 10:40 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
> things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
> XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
> some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
> hand-written JS files.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
+1
all things happening looks very promising (maven, npm, spark comps,...) and
this should help to get more people interested.
2016-03-10 12:18 GMT+01:00 Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>:
> +1 I would try using the npm stuff and framework as an outside user, not s
> core developer right now so it would be positive.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Would have a positive impact and show continuous progress.
> >
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 1:41 PM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the
> big
> > things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
> > XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
> > some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
> > hand-written JS files.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
+1 I would try using the npm stuff and framework as an outside user, not s
core developer right now so it would be positive.
Mike
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
> +1
>
> Would have a positive impact and show continuous progress.
>
>
> -Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 1:41 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
>
> Hi,
>
> Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
> things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
> XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
> some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
> hand-written JS files.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
I'm currently getting test failures in flacon.jx (TestFlexJSClass). I first thought this was due to me building with maven, but now I am getting the same errors with Ant so I guess they are generally problematic.
Here an example ... they are all quite similar:
java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: is "/**\n * @constructor\n * @extends {goog.events.EventTarget}\n * @implements {flash.events.IEventDispatcher}\n * @implements {goog.events.ListenableKey}\n */\norg.apache.flex.A = function() {\n org.apache.flex.A.base(this, 'constructor');\n};\ngoog.inherits(org.apache.flex.A, goog.events.EventTarget);"
got: "/**\n * @constructor\n * @implements {flash.events.IEventDispatcher}\n */\norg.apache.flex.A = function() {\n};"
<Click to see difference>
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:780)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:738)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.test.TestBase.assertOut(TestBase.java:158)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.test.TestBase.assertOut(TestBase.java:163)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.codegen.js.flexjs.TestFlexJSClass.testQualifiedExtendsImplementsMultiple(TestFlexJSClass.java:101)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:119)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:42)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:234)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:74)
Chris
________________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2016 08:49
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Hi,
Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release notes etc etc can be checked?
Thanks,
Justin
AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Justin,
I think I can help ... had similar problems and this one was related to a missing flex-tool-api.jar ... I copied it there manually and then I could build ... after fixing the locale problem preventing non "us_EN" people from running the tests sucessfully.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmclean@me.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2016 22:29
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Hi,
> Thanks for noticing that. Have you looked at the notice files in the builds?
Only the source ones and they seem OKish (they don’t 100% follow policy but there’s no legal issues that I can see). I’ve not looked at the binary ones. I think a bigger issue (but again not one that would block a release but more a nice to have) is that as a user I would expect a lot more in the REAME about changes from the previous version. Having a list of bug fixes/new features would be a help to adoption.
I’m also still unable to get the FlexJS source to compile but not looked too deeply into it.
compile-asjs:
[echo] Cross-compiling Core-0.6.0.swc
[echo] FALCONJX_HOME: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/js/
[java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/flex/tools/FlexTool
...
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:125: Replace: source file /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/target/generated-sources/flexjs/org/apache/flex/events/IEventDispatcher.js doesn't exist
Thanks,
Justin
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi,
I'm trying a simple Hello World in IntelliJ I did at the time of the 0.6
release (with the Josh tutorial in NExtGestAS3), now with 0.7 nigthly
(through Flex SdK installer), and getting the same error as Justin:
Error:[HelloIDEA]: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/flex/tools/FlexTool
I check if it could be flex-tool-api.jar, but this jar is in
"flexjs/js/lib" folder
Anyone knows what could be the problem?
Thanks
2016-03-16 22:29 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for noticing that. Have you looked at the notice files in the
> builds?
>
> Only the source ones and they seem OKish (they don’t 100% follow policy
> but there’s no legal issues that I can see). I’ve not looked at the binary
> ones. I think a bigger issue (but again not one that would block a release
> but more a nice to have) is that as a user I would expect a lot more in the
> REAME about changes from the previous version. Having a list of bug
> fixes/new features would be a help to adoption.
>
> I’m also still unable to get the FlexJS source to compile but not looked
> too deeply into it.
>
> compile-asjs:
> [echo] Cross-compiling Core-0.6.0.swc
> [echo] FALCONJX_HOME:
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/js/
> [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/flex/tools/FlexTool
>
> ...
> BUILD FAILED
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:125:
> Replace: source file
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/target/generated-sources/flexjs/org/apache/flex/events/IEventDispatcher.js
> doesn't exist
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> Thanks for noticing that. Have you looked at the notice files in the builds?
Only the source ones and they seem OKish (they don’t 100% follow policy but there’s no legal issues that I can see). I’ve not looked at the binary ones. I think a bigger issue (but again not one that would block a release but more a nice to have) is that as a user I would expect a lot more in the REAME about changes from the previous version. Having a list of bug fixes/new features would be a help to adoption.
I’m also still unable to get the FlexJS source to compile but not looked too deeply into it.
compile-asjs:
[echo] Cross-compiling Core-0.6.0.swc
[echo] FALCONJX_HOME: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/js/
[java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/flex/tools/FlexTool
...
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:125: Replace: source file /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/target/generated-sources/flexjs/org/apache/flex/events/IEventDispatcher.js doesn't exist
Thanks,
Justin
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/15/16, 10:16 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>
>I think there's a few ads issues that someone may want to look into:
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild
>/artifact/out/asdoc/validation_errors.log
Thanks for noticing that. Have you looked at the notice files in the
builds?
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> FlexJS:
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/
> artifact/out/
> FalconJX:
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBuil
> d/artifact/out/
> For FalconJX, we are only interested in the apache-flex-falconjx packages,
> not the apache-flex-falcon packages.
I think there's a few ads issues that someone may want to look into:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/asdoc/validation_errors.log
Justin
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com>.
I checked the nightly bin and src yesterday on my Mac and they checked out fine. I'm going to fire up my Windows machine today and see what happens.
Peter
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 2:49 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> I think I'm done fixing bugs. We should cut an RC soon in case there are
> complications. Has everyone who plans to vote reviewed the nightly
> packages? Anybody have anything else they want to cram in this release?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>> On 3/14/16, 10:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> I did a pass through the packages and made some changes that should now be
>> reflected in the nightly builds. It would be helpful if others also
>> examined the packages before we start cutting release candidates.
>>
>> FlexJS:
>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild
>> /
>> artifact/out/
>> FalconJX:
>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBui
>> l
>> d/artifact/out/
>> For FalconJX, we are only interested in the apache-flex-falconjx packages,
>> not the apache-flex-falcon packages.
>>
>> -Alex
>
RE: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
I haven't gotten around to checking it. I'll look it over tonight.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:50 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
I think I'm done fixing bugs. We should cut an RC soon in case there are
complications. Has everyone who plans to vote reviewed the nightly
packages? Anybody have anything else they want to cram in this release?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/14/16, 10:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>I did a pass through the packages and made some changes that should now be
>reflected in the nightly builds. It would be helpful if others also
>examined the packages before we start cutting release candidates.
>
>FlexJS:
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild
>/
>artifact/out/
>FalconJX:
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBui
>l
>d/artifact/out/
>For FalconJX, we are only interested in the apache-flex-falconjx packages,
>not the apache-flex-falcon packages.
>
>-Alex
>
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/22/16, 12:19 AM, "piotrz" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I'll try examining FlexJS package tomorrow. Do you expect to do from PMCs
>something more than in your approval script?
The approval script attempts to guide you to check the minimum
requirements.
>
>I'm still try to change paths in Build.xml for examples, but building
>FlexJS
>is taking me more time than I thought. - For sure these changes are not
>for
>this relese.
What problems are you running into getting the repo to build?
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by piotrz <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
I'll try examining FlexJS package tomorrow. Do you expect to do from PMCs
something more than in your approval script?
I'm still try to change paths in Build.xml for examples, but building FlexJS
is taking me more time than I thought. - For sure these changes are not for
this relese.
Piotr
-----
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/LAST-CALL-Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0-6-0-tp51803p51924.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I think I'm done fixing bugs. We should cut an RC soon in case there are
complications. Has everyone who plans to vote reviewed the nightly
packages? Anybody have anything else they want to cram in this release?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/14/16, 10:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>I did a pass through the packages and made some changes that should now be
>reflected in the nightly builds. It would be helpful if others also
>examined the packages before we start cutting release candidates.
>
>FlexJS:
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild
>/
>artifact/out/
>FalconJX:
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBui
>l
>d/artifact/out/
>For FalconJX, we are only interested in the apache-flex-falconjx packages,
>not the apache-flex-falcon packages.
>
>-Alex
>
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/11/16, 8:49 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 3/10/16, 11:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release
>>notes etc etc can be checked?
>
>There are the nightly builds. I haven't worked on RELEASE_NOTES or
>double-checked LICENSE and NOTICE yet, but the more eyes on it sooner, the
>better off we are.
I did a pass through the packages and made some changes that should now be
reflected in the nightly builds. It would be helpful if others also
examined the packages before we start cutting release candidates.
FlexJS:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/
artifact/out/
FalconJX:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBuil
d/artifact/out/
For FalconJX, we are only interested in the apache-flex-falconjx packages,
not the apache-flex-falcon packages.
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/11/16, 9:34 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 11, 2016 8:49 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote
>>
>> I'm wondering if we need to have a release branch. I don't think there
>>is
>> anything due to land in the develop branch that "shouldn't" go out in
>> these releases. It saves time by not having to set up release branches
>> and merge them back in.
>
>I think we should follow the tried and tested release process no matter
>what. Otherwise, IMHO it would set a bad precedent.
We've never cut a release branch for any prior release of FlexJS, so the
bad precedence has already been set. I'm not a fan of burning time if
there isn't any advantage.
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 11, 2016 8:49 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/10/16, 11:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release
> >notes etc etc can be checked?
>
> There are the nightly builds. I haven't worked on RELEASE_NOTES or
> double-checked LICENSE and NOTICE yet, but the more eyes on it sooner, the
> better off we are.
>
> I'm wondering if we need to have a release branch. I don't think there is
> anything due to land in the develop branch that "shouldn't" go out in
> these releases. It saves time by not having to set up release branches
> and merge them back in.
I think we should follow the tried and tested release process no matter
what. Otherwise, IMHO it would set a bad precedent.
Thanks,
Om
>
> -Alex
>
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/10/16, 11:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release
>notes etc etc can be checked?
There are the nightly builds. I haven't worked on RELEASE_NOTES or
double-checked LICENSE and NOTICE yet, but the more eyes on it sooner, the
better off we are.
I'm wondering if we need to have a release branch. I don't think there is
anything due to land in the develop branch that "shouldn't" go out in
these releases. It saves time by not having to set up release branches
and merge them back in.
-Alex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release notes etc etc can be checked?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/10/16, 3:17 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>But means fixing the Mustella tests once and for all.
FlexJS is unrelated to the mustella test runs that are failing. I keep
hoping someone will be motivated enough to learn how to fix mustella tests
so it doesn't always come down to me, but maybe I'll look after the April
event.
-ALex
Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
But means fixing the Mustella tests once and for all.
The usual trick of closing and opening each player version on the host
hasn't worked:
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/?auto_refresh=false
Tom
On 10/03/16 11:09, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
> +1
>
> Would have a positive impact and show continuous progress.
>
>
> -Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 1:41 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
>
> Hi,
>
> Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
> things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
> XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
> some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
> hand-written JS files.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
RE: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
+1
Would have a positive impact and show continuous progress.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 1:41 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0
Hi,
Should we try to cut a release before the SF event? I don't think the big
things under development (Maven integration, Spark-like component set,
XML) will land in time for the SF event, but we've fixed some bugs, added
some features like Tree, Storage, Proxy, Reflection, and eliminated all
hand-written JS files.
Thoughts?
-Alex