Re: TR:TABLE - rendering bug? (TH-tags in TBODY)

[Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>]

I don't see any special reason for keeping TH in TBODY.
We didn't want to put footers in TFOOT because W3C
geniuses decided that TFOOT had to be placed *before*
TBODY, which means the default tab order goes
"headers, footers, body", which is just wrong.

-- Adam


On 5/21/07, carsten.pieper@continentale.de <ca...@continentale.de>
wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> a question about the TR:TABLE implementation: Is this a bug or
> deliberately done so?
>
> When a TR:TABLE is rendered, the TH-tags end up in the TBODY  instead of
> an THEAD ?
>
> I am asking because we need a fixed header for scrolling tables. I know
> that there has been a similar
> posting on the same topic in the adf-users-mailing-list
> (April 17th:"fixed header, scrolling body in <TR:TABLE> ... hidden
> feature?"),
> but we would prefer to achieve the fixed table header by tweaking the CSS
> rather than writing our own
> TableRenderer.
>
> The CSS tweaking would, of course, be much easier, it the header stuff
> would be rendered
> in a THEAD section (something like:
>
>    af|table::content tbody{
>            overflow-x: hidden;
>            overflow-y: auto;"
>    }
>
> should do this...)
>
> Thanks,
> Carsten
>