You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "V.Narayanan (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2005/09/27 17:30:54 UTC

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-587) Providing JDBC 4.0 support for derby

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-587?page=all ]

V.Narayanan updated DERBY-587:
------------------------------

    Attachment: jdbc40.diff
                jdbc4.0.sxw

Hi,
I am attaching the patch for the JDBC4.0 STUB IMPLEMENTATION. Also attached is a design document which explains the changes incorporated and the classes and the build files affected due to this.
thanx
V.Narayanan

> Providing JDBC 4.0 support for derby
> ------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-587
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-587
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: New Feature
>   Components: JDBC
>     Versions: 10.2.0.0
>     Reporter: V.Narayanan
>     Assignee: V.Narayanan
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>  Attachments: jdbc4.0.sxw, jdbc40.diff
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-587) Providing JDBC 4.0 support for derby

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>.
V.Narayanan (JIRA) wrote:

>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-587?page=all ]
> 
> V.Narayanan updated DERBY-587:
> ------------------------------
> 
>     Attachment: jdbc40.diff
>                 jdbc4.0.sxw
> 
> Hi,
> I am attaching the patch for the JDBC4.0 STUB IMPLEMENTATION. Also attached is a design document which explains the changes incorporated and the classes and the build files affected due to this.

The document seems to imply that if this patch is applied I need to
download JDK 1.6 to compile Derby. I do not believe this is acceptable.
Is there a jdk1.6 for MacOS for example?

Can the jdk 1.6 dependency be made optional? Like the OSGi and J2ME
optional builds.

Dan.