You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/11 06:03:58 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3560) Aggregate query performance
is worse with encoded columns for schema with large number of columns
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15806107#comment-15806107 ]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3560 at 1/11/17 6:03 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~mujtabachohan], would you mind trying out this patch to see if it helps perf of count\(*) query?
was (Author: samarthjain):
[~mujtabachohan], would you mind trying out this patch to see if it helps perf of count(*) query?
> Aggregate query performance is worse with encoded columns for schema with large number of columns
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3560
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Mujtaba Chohan
> Assignee: Samarth Jain
> Fix For: 4.10.0
>
> Attachments: DataGenerator.java, PHOENIX-3565.patch
>
>
> Schema with 5K columns
> {noformat}
> create table (k1 integer, k2 integer, c1 varchar ... c5000 varchar CONSTRAINT PK PRIMARY KEY (K1, K2))
> VERSIONS=1, MULTI_TENANT=true, IMMUTABLE_ROWS=true
> {noformat}
> In this test, there are no null columns and each column contains 200 chars i.e. 1MB of data per row.
> Count * aggregation is about 5X slower with encoded columns when compared to table non-encoded columns using the same schema.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)