You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "GaoLun (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/07 02:13:20 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FLINK-2985) Allow different field names for unionAll() in Table API

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15317673#comment-15317673 ] 

GaoLun edited comment on FLINK-2985 at 6/7/16 2:12 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------

The refactoring work has been finished. If nobody working on this, i will go on with it. :)


was (Author: gallenvara_bg):
The refactoring work has been finished and i will go on with this issue. :)

> Allow different field names for unionAll() in Table API
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2985
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The recently merged `unionAll` operator checks if the field names of the left and right side are equal. Actually, this is not necessary. The union operator in SQL checks only the types and uses the names of left side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)