You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/18 00:54:44 UTC

[jira] Created: (TS-356) Switch code base to C99 ?

Switch code base to C99 ?
-------------------------

                 Key: TS-356
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356
             Project: Traffic Server
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: 2.2.0


This is a placeholder bug for tracking changes we should do to make the code C99 "compatible". Note that C99 is not fully supported by many (most?) compilers, so we have to be a little bit careful with what we use. Please attach to this bug for areas / code changes that we should consider.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (TS-356) Switch code base to C99 ?

Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-356:
-----------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
                       (was: 2.2.0)

> Switch code base to C99 ?
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> This is a placeholder bug for tracking changes we should do to make the code C99 "compatible". Note that C99 is not fully supported by many (most?) compilers, so we have to be a little bit careful with what we use. Please attach to this bug for areas / code changes that we should consider.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (TS-356) Switch code base to C99 ?

Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Leif Hedstrom resolved TS-356.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

> Switch code base to C99 ?
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> This is a placeholder bug for tracking changes we should do to make the code C99 "compatible". Note that C99 is not fully supported by many (most?) compilers, so we have to be a little bit careful with what we use. Please attach to this bug for areas / code changes that we should consider.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (TS-356) Switch code base to C99 ?

Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868437#action_12868437 ] 

Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-356:
----------------------------------

int-types
======

There's a whole slew of defines that we use, which can be replaced with the equivalent C99 standard defines. For example

int32_t
int64_t

etc.

Another thing we should clean up is the usage of defines like INT_MAX, INK32_MAX etc. and use the appropriate C99 defines.

> Switch code base to C99 ?
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-356
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> This is a placeholder bug for tracking changes we should do to make the code C99 "compatible". Note that C99 is not fully supported by many (most?) compilers, so we have to be a little bit careful with what we use. Please attach to this bug for areas / code changes that we should consider.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.