You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by lu...@free.fr on 2008/11/20 16:41:00 UTC
Fwd: [MATH] commons math 2.0 snapshot jars
Hello,
Here is a discussion started with one [math] user. As a result, James proposed to switch development back from branch MATH_2_0 to trunk (and to switch trunk to a new 1.x branch). I agree with this suggestion but cannot be sure about how many users will be affected. Just to be sure, we should probably do a move rather than a copy as I suggested in my last message (and btw, James, it is what you really suggested in the first place, isn't it ?).
So does anybody have an opinion on this ?
Luc
----- Mail transféré -----
De: "luc maisonobe" <lu...@free.fr>
À: "Commons Users List" <us...@commons.apache.org>
Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Novembre 2008 16:17:01 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [MATH] commons math 2.0 snapshot jars
----- "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:40 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > You are right. When development for 2.0 started, we were not sure
> that if this would be the next version or if a 1.3 could be released
> before. So we decided to use a branch for 2.0 and the trunk for 1.x.
> Now it seems there will not be a 1.3 release and the next version will
> be 2.0, so it would be more straightforward to have 2.0 be the trunk,
> I agree. I don't think we will switch branch/trunk at this
> intermediate state. We will more probably finish work on 2.0 and put
> it back to trunk at release time.
> >
>
> Why the reluctance to switch? With SVN, it's extremely easy to move
> stuff around. If "current" development is going on within the 2.0
> branch, then it should probably be the trunk. Just move trunk to a
> release-1-maintenance branch or something and move the 2.0 branch to
> trunk.
Yes, I know, its only two "svn copy" commands. The rationale for me was mainly that it was decided some months ago to work on this branch and this is now known by several users. This was one of the reasons why when I fixed an issue in Jira, I always added the version numer and the branch of the correction, i.e. MATH_2_0.
As both of you voiced against this situation and your proposal is sound, I'll propose the switch on the dev list.
Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] moving 2.0 branch to trunk WAS: Re: Fwd: [MATH] commons math 2.0 snapshot jars
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Make it so. :)
+1
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going once, going twice....
>
> Any objections to
>
> 0) svn move trunk branches/MATH_1_3
> 1) svn move branches/MATH_2_0 trunk
>
> Can anyone see any problems with this?
>
> Phil
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [math] moving 2.0 branch to trunk WAS: Re: Fwd: [MATH] commons
math 2.0 snapshot jars
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
luc.maisonobe@free.fr wrote:
> Go ahead, thanks.
>
> Luc
>
> ----- "Phil Steitz" <ph...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> Going once, going twice....
>>
>> Any objections to
>>
>> 0) svn move trunk branches/MATH_1_3
>> 1) svn move branches/MATH_2_0 trunk
>>
>> Can anyone see any problems with this?
>>
>> Phil
>>
Done
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] moving 2.0 branch to trunk WAS: Re: Fwd: [MATH] commons
math 2.0 snapshot jars
Posted by lu...@free.fr.
Go ahead, thanks.
Luc
----- "Phil Steitz" <ph...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Going once, going twice....
>
> Any objections to
>
> 0) svn move trunk branches/MATH_1_3
> 1) svn move branches/MATH_2_0 trunk
>
> Can anyone see any problems with this?
>
> Phil
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
[math] moving 2.0 branch to trunk WAS: Re: Fwd: [MATH] commons math
2.0 snapshot jars
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
Going once, going twice....
Any objections to
0) svn move trunk branches/MATH_1_3
1) svn move branches/MATH_2_0 trunk
Can anyone see any problems with this?
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Fwd: [MATH] commons math 2.0 snapshot jars
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
luc.maisonobe@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a discussion started with one [math] user. As a result, James proposed to switch development back from branch MATH_2_0 to trunk (and to switch trunk to a new 1.x branch). I agree with this suggestion but cannot be sure about how many users will be affected. Just to be sure, we should probably do a move rather than a copy as I suggested in my last message (and btw, James, it is what you really suggested in the first place, isn't it ?).
>
> So does anybody have an opinion on this ?
>
>
Makes sense to me. I can understand how the current setup is confusing
and an unnecessary barier for new contributors. I am about to commit a
batch of changes for MATH-212, so I would prefer to wait until I have
this stuff in (next day or two), but will do the move (assuming all are
OK with that approach) next week if there are no objections.
Phil
> Luc
>
> ----- Mail transféré -----
> De: "luc maisonobe" <lu...@free.fr>
> À: "Commons Users List" <us...@commons.apache.org>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Novembre 2008 16:17:01 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
> Objet: Re: [MATH] commons math 2.0 snapshot jars
>
>
> ----- "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:40 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> You are right. When development for 2.0 started, we were not sure
>>>
>> that if this would be the next version or if a 1.3 could be released
>> before. So we decided to use a branch for 2.0 and the trunk for 1.x.
>> Now it seems there will not be a 1.3 release and the next version will
>> be 2.0, so it would be more straightforward to have 2.0 be the trunk,
>> I agree. I don't think we will switch branch/trunk at this
>> intermediate state. We will more probably finish work on 2.0 and put
>> it back to trunk at release time.
>>
>> Why the reluctance to switch? With SVN, it's extremely easy to move
>> stuff around. If "current" development is going on within the 2.0
>> branch, then it should probably be the trunk. Just move trunk to a
>> release-1-maintenance branch or something and move the 2.0 branch to
>> trunk.
>>
>
> Yes, I know, its only two "svn copy" commands. The rationale for me was mainly that it was decided some months ago to work on this branch and this is now known by several users. This was one of the reasons why when I fixed an issue in Jira, I always added the version numer and the branch of the correction, i.e. MATH_2_0.
>
> As both of you voiced against this situation and your proposal is sound, I'll propose the switch on the dev list.
>
> Luc
>
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org