You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/20 19:55:46 UTC
Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Hey
I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1 this
week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving on to
1.8.
BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just increment
by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
Joe
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io>.
+1 ---but lets wait for Monday
as pat suggested I think we should package, and promote the dist too
> BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just increment
> by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
Well, I'd personally like to keep MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH for trackabily
...and yes w/ 1.6.1 it certainly was not a patch release. That was
dumb but the world still turns.
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
iOS has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jesse <pu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WP7 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdonald@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
>> rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
>>
>> Simon Mac Donald
>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether
>> we
>> > did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit
>> > more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0
>> > releases.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
>> > >
>> > > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like
>> this:
>> > > >
>> > > >1) tag 1.7.0
>> > > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
>> > > >3) tag 1.7.1
>> > > >4) crap one more bug
>> > > >5) tag 1.7.2
>> > > >6) phew, regression passed
>> > > >7) Release 1.7.2!
>> > > >
>> > > >What do you think?
>> > > >
>> > > >Simon Mac Donald
>> > > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
>> > > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>> > > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> > > >> >Hey
>> > > >> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
>> > > >> 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >> > > >>this
>> > > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in
>> before
>> > > >> moving
>> > > >> > > >>on to
>> > > >> > > >> >1.8.
>> > > >> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we
>> > > >>just
>> > > >> > > >> >increment
>> > > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
>> > > >> > confusion.
>> > > >> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > >> >Joe
>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Jesse <pu...@gmail.com>.
WP7 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdonald@gmail.com
> wrote:
> kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
> rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether
> we
> > did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit
> > more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0
> > releases.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
> > >
> > > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like
> this:
> > > >
> > > >1) tag 1.7.0
> > > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
> > > >3) tag 1.7.1
> > > >4) crap one more bug
> > > >5) tag 1.7.2
> > > >6) phew, regression passed
> > > >7) Release 1.7.2!
> > > >
> > > >What do you think?
> > > >
> > > >Simon Mac Donald
> > > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> > > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> > > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> >Hey
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
> > > >> 1.7.0rc1
> > > >> > > >>this
> > > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in
> before
> > > >> moving
> > > >> > > >>on to
> > > >> > > >> >1.8.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we
> > > >>just
> > > >> > > >> >increment
> > > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
> > > >> > confusion.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >Joe
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
O ya and Docs tagged 1.7.0rc1
On 4/24/12 3:11 PM, "Filip Maj" <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Blackberry tagged! Sorry on the lateness on that one
>
>On 4/23/12 12:04 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
>>rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
>>
>>Simon Mac Donald
>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is
>>>whether we
>>> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a
>>>bit
>>> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0
>>> releases.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
>>> >
>>> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like
>>>this:
>>> > >
>>> > >1) tag 1.7.0
>>> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
>>> > >3) tag 1.7.1
>>> > >4) crap one more bug
>>> > >5) tag 1.7.2
>>> > >6) phew, regression passed
>>> > >7) Release 1.7.2!
>>> > >
>>> > >What do you think?
>>> > >
>>> > >Simon Mac Donald
>>> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
>>> > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>>> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >> >Hey
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably
>>>tag
>>> > >> 1.7.0rc1
>>> > >> > > >>this
>>> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in
>>>before
>>> > >> moving
>>> > >> > > >>on to
>>> > >> > > >> >1.8.
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can
>>>we
>>> > >>just
>>> > >> > > >> >increment
>>> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot
>>>of
>>> > >> > confusion.
>>> > >> > > >> >
>>> > >> > > >> >Joe
>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Blackberry tagged! Sorry on the lateness on that one
On 4/23/12 12:04 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
>rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is
>>whether we
>> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a
>>bit
>> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0
>> releases.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
>> >
>> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like
>>this:
>> > >
>> > >1) tag 1.7.0
>> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
>> > >3) tag 1.7.1
>> > >4) crap one more bug
>> > >5) tag 1.7.2
>> > >6) phew, regression passed
>> > >7) Release 1.7.2!
>> > >
>> > >What do you think?
>> > >
>> > >Simon Mac Donald
>> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
>> > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >Hey
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably
>>tag
>> > >> 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > > >>this
>> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in
>>before
>> > >> moving
>> > >> > > >>on to
>> > >> > > >> >1.8.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can
>>we
>> > >>just
>> > >> > > >> >increment
>> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot
>>of
>> > >> > confusion.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >Joe
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com>.
kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether we
> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit
> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0
> releases.
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
> >
> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this:
> > >
> > >1) tag 1.7.0
> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
> > >3) tag 1.7.1
> > >4) crap one more bug
> > >5) tag 1.7.2
> > >6) phew, regression passed
> > >7) Release 1.7.2!
> > >
> > >What do you think?
> > >
> > >Simon Mac Donald
> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> >Hey
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
> > >> 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > > >>this
> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before
> > >> moving
> > >> > > >>on to
> > >> > > >> >1.8.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we
> > >>just
> > >> > > >> >increment
> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
> > >> > confusion.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >Joe
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether we
did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit
more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0 releases.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
>
> On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this:
> >
> >1) tag 1.7.0
> >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
> >3) tag 1.7.1
> >4) crap one more bug
> >5) tag 1.7.2
> >6) phew, regression passed
> >7) Release 1.7.2!
> >
> >What do you think?
> >
> >Simon Mac Donald
> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Let's tag it!
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> >Hey
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
> >> 1.7.0rc1
> >> > > >>this
> >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before
> >> moving
> >> > > >>on to
> >> > > >> >1.8.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we
> >>just
> >> > > >> >increment
> >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
> >> > confusion.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >Joe
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this:
>
>1) tag 1.7.0
>2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
>3) tag 1.7.1
>4) crap one more bug
>5) tag 1.7.2
>6) phew, regression passed
>7) Release 1.7.2!
>
>What do you think?
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >
>> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >
>> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
>> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Let's tag it!
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >Hey
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
>> 1.7.0rc1
>> > > >>this
>> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before
>> moving
>> > > >>on to
>> > > >> >1.8.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we
>>just
>> > > >> >increment
>> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
>> > confusion.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >Joe
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com>.
This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this:
1) tag 1.7.0
2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
3) tag 1.7.1
4) crap one more bug
5) tag 1.7.2
6) phew, regression passed
7) Release 1.7.2!
What do you think?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >
> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > > >
> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> > > >>
> > > >> Let's tag it!
> > > >>
> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Hey
> > > >> >
> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag
> 1.7.0rc1
> > > >>this
> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before
> moving
> > > >>on to
> > > >> >1.8.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
> > > >> >increment
> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
> > confusion.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Joe
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>.
Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> >
> > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >
> > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> > >>
> > >> Let's tag it!
> > >>
> > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Hey
> > >> >
> > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1
> > >>this
> > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving
> > >>on to
> > >> >1.8.
> > >> >
> > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
> > >> >increment
> > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of
> confusion.
> > >> >
> > >> >Joe
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>
> On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> >
> >> From: fil@adobe.com
> >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> >>
> >> Let's tag it!
> >>
> >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hey
> >> >
> >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1
> >>this
> >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving
> >>on to
> >> >1.8.
> >> >
> >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
> >> >increment
> >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
> >> >
> >> >Joe
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>
>> From: fil@adobe.com
>> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>>
>> Let's tag it!
>>
>> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hey
>> >
>> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1
>>this
>> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving
>>on to
>> >1.8.
>> >
>> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
>> >increment
>> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
>> >
>> >Joe
>>
>
RE: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Herm Wong <he...@hotmail.com>.
webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> From: fil@adobe.com
> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>
> Let's tag it!
>
> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hey
> >
> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1 this
> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving on to
> >1.8.
> >
> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
> >increment
> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
> >
> >Joe
>
Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Let's tag it!
On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hey
>
>I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag 1.7.0rc1 this
>week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before moving on to
>1.8.
>
>BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we just
>increment
>by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of confusion.
>
>Joe