You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by Timothy Ward <ti...@apache.org> on 2011/10/07 15:00:29 UTC
RE: Semantic Versioning tool
Hi BJ,
I'd like to check an example with you, just to confirm that I have this absolutely right in my head and hopefully clarify things for anyone who is still confused. The Aries Proxy component makes use of OSGi 4.3 Weaving Hooks, which expects bundles to provide a WeavingHook implementation service. Even though the proxy bundle implements the WeavingHook interface I believe it is a consumer of the Weaving Hook API (the provider being the framework) because the WeavingHook interface is designed to be implemented by users. This means (I think) that the proxy component should use an import range of [1,2) for that package.
Regards,
Tim
> To: dev@aries.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Semantic Versioning tool
> From: hargrave@us.ibm.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:01 -0400
>
> Graham Charters ask me and/or Peter Kriens to chime in here...
>
> So I wrote a blog post.
> http://blog.bjhargrave.com/2011/09/needs-of-many-outweigh-needs-of-few.html
>
> --
>
> BJ Hargrave
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
> hargrave@us.ibm.com
>
> office: +1 386 848 1781
> mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>
RE: Semantic Versioning tool
Posted by Timothy Ward <ti...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the confirmation (and additional info). Hopefully this can serve as a useful concrete example for any future discussions in Aries.
Tim
To: timothyjward@apache.org
CC: dev@aries.apache.org; timothyjward@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Semantic Versioning tool
From: hargrave@us.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:24:32 -0400
The package-info file for the weaving package
provides the clue. The framework is considered the provider of the weaving
API. The WeavingHook type is not marked @noimplement as it is expected
to be implemented by consumers of the API. So the proxy component should
import the range "[1,2)".
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi
Alliance
hargrave@us.ibm.com
office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788
From:
Timothy Ward <ti...@apache.org>
To:
<de...@aries.apache.org>,
BJ Hargrave/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Date:
2011/10/07 09:01
Subject:
RE: Semantic
Versioning tool
Sent by:
<ti...@hotmail.com>
Hi BJ,
I'd like to check an example with you, just to confirm that I have this
absolutely right in my head and hopefully clarify things for anyone who
is still confused. The Aries Proxy component makes use of OSGi 4.3 Weaving
Hooks, which expects bundles to provide a WeavingHook implementation service.
Even though the proxy bundle implements the WeavingHook interface I believe
it is a consumer of the Weaving Hook API (the provider being the framework)
because the WeavingHook interface is designed to be implemented by users.
This means (I think) that the proxy component should use an import range
of [1,2) for that package.
Regards,
Tim
> To: dev@aries.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Semantic Versioning tool
> From: hargrave@us.ibm.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:01 -0400
>
> Graham Charters ask me and/or Peter Kriens to chime in here...
>
> So I wrote a blog post.
> http://blog.bjhargrave.com/2011/09/needs-of-many-outweigh-needs-of-few.html
>
> --
>
> BJ Hargrave
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
> hargrave@us.ibm.com
>
> office: +1 386 848 1781
> mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>
RE: Semantic Versioning tool
Posted by BJ Hargrave <ha...@us.ibm.com>.
The package-info file for the weaving package provides the clue. The
framework is considered the provider of the weaving API. The WeavingHook
type is not marked @noimplement as it is expected to be implemented by
consumers of the API. So the proxy component should import the range
"[1,2)".
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
hargrave@us.ibm.com
office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788
From: Timothy Ward <ti...@apache.org>
To: <de...@aries.apache.org>, BJ Hargrave/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Date: 2011/10/07 09:01
Subject: RE: Semantic Versioning tool
Sent by: <ti...@hotmail.com>
Hi BJ,
I'd like to check an example with you, just to confirm that I have this
absolutely right in my head and hopefully clarify things for anyone who is
still confused. The Aries Proxy component makes use of OSGi 4.3 Weaving
Hooks, which expects bundles to provide a WeavingHook implementation
service. Even though the proxy bundle implements the WeavingHook interface
I believe it is a consumer of the Weaving Hook API (the provider being the
framework) because the WeavingHook interface is designed to be implemented
by users. This means (I think) that the proxy component should use an
import range of [1,2) for that package.
Regards,
Tim
> To: dev@aries.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Semantic Versioning tool
> From: hargrave@us.ibm.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:01 -0400
>
> Graham Charters ask me and/or Peter Kriens to chime in here...
>
> So I wrote a blog post.
>
http://blog.bjhargrave.com/2011/09/needs-of-many-outweigh-needs-of-few.html
>
> --
>
> BJ Hargrave
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
> hargrave@us.ibm.com
>
> office: +1 386 848 1781
> mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>