[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-1710) [Java] Decide what to do with non-nullable vectors in new vector class hierarchy

["Li Jin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242687#comment-16242687 ] 

Li Jin commented on ARROW-1710:
-------------------------------

Seems we agree to remove non nullable vectors.

The next question is, what do people feel about dropping the "Nullable" prefix in new vector classes? [~bryanc] brought this up initially.

I am +1 for dropping the "Nullable" prefix. It makes the code more concise. 

> [Java] Decide what to do with non-nullable vectors in new vector class hierarchy 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-1710
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Java - Vectors
>            Reporter: Li Jin
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> So far the consensus seems to be remove all non-nullable vectors. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)