[slack-digest] [2019-04-04] #general

[OpenWhisk Team Slack <ra...@apache.org>]

2019-04-04 01:34:42 UTC - Dominic Kim: Hi
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554341682061300
----
2019-04-04 01:48:53 UTC - Dominic Kim: I want to start the discussion for my new architecture proposal (<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Design+consideration>).
It could be breaking changes. So I want to form a consensus on this.
What would be a good starting point?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554342533065200
----
2019-04-04 01:55:47 UTC - Dominic Kim: I might open a thread in the dev mailing list and a PR to start it?
+1 : Rodric Rabbah, keonhee Kim
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554342947066300
----
2019-04-04 03:25:23 UTC - Barry: Hi, what system errors will cause the invoker unhealthy?
// Pings are arriving fine, the invoker returns system errors though
  case object Unhealthy extends Unusable { val asString = "unhealthy" }
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554348323067300
----
2019-04-04 03:28:03 UTC - Dominic Kim: If the invoker fail to invoke the health action, it will become unhealthy.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554348483068700
----
2019-04-04 03:28:14 UTC - Dominic Kim: The threshold is 7 of 10.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554348494069000
----
2019-04-04 03:28:39 UTC - Dominic Kim: More than 3 invocations are failed, it will become unhealthy.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554348519069800
----
2019-04-04 03:29:47 UTC - Barry: Is this the health action "whisk.system/invokerHealthTestAction" ?
white_check_mark : Rodric Rabbah
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554348587070300
----
2019-04-04 06:55:06 UTC - Rob Allen: Morning all
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554360906070700
----
2019-04-04 06:55:25 UTC - Rob Allen: I'm trying to understand the output of rcverify.sh's "scanning for binaries"
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554360925071200
----
2019-04-04 06:56:17 UTC - Rob Allen: Specifically, for the 1.13.0-incubating version of the Go runtime, I get: `scanning for binaries... failed (/var/folders/vz/g5vqq_bx3r37xngt6gjt8v800000gn/T/tmp.fMKuSa2g/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go-1.13.0-incubating/openwhisk/_test/pysample/exec)`
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554360977071900
----
2019-04-04 06:57:15 UTC - Rob Allen: Clearly `exec` exists, so is it a failure that it is in this release?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554361035072300
----
2019-04-04 07:06:08 UTC - Rob Allen: Ah - nm,. it's a shell script
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554361568072600
----
2019-04-04 08:50:26 UTC - Dominic Kim: JFYI, I`ve just opened a thread <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/76e83ce6f11bdbe36a86ad3042de08023a7ce98098b43ea37433fcd4@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E>
+1 : Rodric Rabbah, keonhee Kim
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554367826073100
----
2019-04-04 10:54:01 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: @Rob Allen there’s a similar false positive for “compile” in php runtime. Arguably the script should check the file type is txt not binary instead of checking for +x Unix file permission  
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554375241074700
----
2019-04-04 10:54:43 UTC - Rob Allen: @Rodric Rabbah Yeah - that's how I worked it out :slightly_smiling_face:
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554375283075100
----
2019-04-04 10:57:23 UTC - Rob Allen: First time I've tried to participate in a VOTE - not as onerous as I feared. The instructions in the mail help a lot
yay : Rodric Rabbah
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554375443076300
----