You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> on 2009/03/23 02:00:12 UTC
[VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Last week's vote failed to get the 3 PMC votes to make an official release.
Only one PMC vote was cast, a +1 from Mike McCandless.
In the meantime, some bugs were fixed and PyLucene 2.4.1 RC5 was uploaded to
the staging area:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
Thanks !
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
I tried the install (for impatient users, nice!), and got this error
on the install of JCC:
Installed /Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/JCC-2.2-py2.5-macosx-10.5-
i386.egg
Processing dependencies for JCC==2.2
Searching for JCC==2.2
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/JCC/
No local packages or download links found for JCC==2.2
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('JCC==2.2')
I chatted with Andi about it, and even did some screen sharing so he
could hack at it a bit himself. Turns out the above wasn't a
"problem", as JCC installed fine. We got a similar error (that has
long since scrolled off my history, sorry, due to running the
manindex.py example) on the pylucene install step, but again it still
all installed fine.
I've run some samples, looked at the basic docs and legal files. All
looks good.
+1
Erik
On Mar 24, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>> some of
>> the other subprojects do)
>
> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>
> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>
> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
> +1 Mike McCandless
> +0 Chris Hostetter
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
I tried the install (for impatient users, nice!), and got this error
on the install of JCC:
Installed /Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/JCC-2.2-py2.5-macosx-10.5-
i386.egg
Processing dependencies for JCC==2.2
Searching for JCC==2.2
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/JCC/
No local packages or download links found for JCC==2.2
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('JCC==2.2')
I chatted with Andi about it, and even did some screen sharing so he
could hack at it a bit himself. Turns out the above wasn't a
"problem", as JCC installed fine. We got a similar error (that has
long since scrolled off my history, sorry, due to running the
manindex.py example) on the pylucene install step, but again it still
all installed fine.
I've run some samples, looked at the basic docs and legal files. All
looks good.
+1
Erik
On Mar 24, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>> some of
>> the other subprojects do)
>
> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>
> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>
> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
> +1 Mike McCandless
> +0 Chris Hostetter
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Apr 1, 2009, at 13:12, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Andi,
>
> I think you now have the necessary votes such that this has passed.
> Feel free to finish out the release. If you need help on what that
> is, both the Solr and Lucene wiki's have info on making releases.
Yep, I should get to this in the next few days.
Andi..
>
>
> Cheers,
> Grant
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>>> I'm at ApacheCon, but will try to look at it tomorrow.
>>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to release RC7.
>>>>
>>>> I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>>>>>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>>>>>> some of
>>>>>> the other subprojects do)
>>>>>
>>>>> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
>>>>> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
>>>>> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>>>>>
>>>>> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>>>>> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
>>>>> +1 Mike McCandless
>>>>> +0 Chris Hostetter
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>
>>>>> Andi..
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
> using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Hey Andi,
I think you now have the necessary votes such that this has passed.
Feel free to finish out the release. If you need help on what that
is, both the Solr and Lucene wiki's have info on making releases.
Cheers,
Grant
On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> I'm at ApacheCon, but will try to look at it tomorrow.
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to release RC7.
>>>
>>> I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>>>>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>>>>> some of
>>>>> the other subprojects do)
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
>>>> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
>>>> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>>>> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
>>>> +1 Mike McCandless
>>>> +0 Chris Hostetter
>>>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>> Andi..
>>>>
>>
>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Hey Andi,
I think you now have the necessary votes such that this has passed.
Feel free to finish out the release. If you need help on what that
is, both the Solr and Lucene wiki's have info on making releases.
Cheers,
Grant
On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> I'm at ApacheCon, but will try to look at it tomorrow.
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to release RC7.
>>>
>>> I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>>>>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>>>>> some of
>>>>> the other subprojects do)
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
>>>> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
>>>> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>>>> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>>>>
>>>> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
>>>> +1 Mike McCandless
>>>> +0 Chris Hostetter
>>>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>> Andi..
>>>>
>>
>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I'm at ApacheCon, but will try to look at it tomorrow.
>
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> +1 to release RC7.
>>
>> I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>>>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>>>> some of
>>>> the other subprojects do)
>>>
>>> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
>>> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
>>> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>>>
>>> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>>
>>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>>> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>>>
>>> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
>>> +1 Mike McCandless
>>> +0 Chris Hostetter
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>> Andi..
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
I'm at ApacheCon, but will try to look at it tomorrow.
On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> +1 to release RC7.
>
> I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
>
> Mike
>
> Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what
>>> some of
>>> the other subprojects do)
>>
>> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
>> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
>> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>>
>> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>
>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>>
>> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
>> +1 Mike McCandless
>> +0 Chris Hostetter
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> Andi..
>>
Fwd: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Ugh, forgot to CC pylucene-dev.
Mike
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
To: general@lucene.apache.org, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>
+1 to release RC7.
I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
Mike
Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
>> the other subprojects do)
>
> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>
> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>
> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
> +1 Mike McCandless
> +0 Chris Hostetter
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
>
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
+1 to release RC7.
I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Rest of Us" into sections.
Mike
Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
>> the other subprojects do)
>
> PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
> - a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
> - a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
>
> PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
> Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
>
> PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
> +1 Mike McCandless
> +0 Chris Hostetter
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
>
[VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
- a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
- a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
+1 Mike McCandless
+0 Chris Hostetter
Thanks !
Andi..
[VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions:
- a local copy of the PyLucene web site for offline viewing
- a 'for the impatient ones' quick installation instructions
PyLucene 2.4.1 RC7 is available from the staging area:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
Three +1 PMC votes are needed for an official release to happen.
PyLucene RC6 received two votes:
+1 Mike McCandless
+0 Chris Hostetter
Thanks !
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
>
> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
I just remembered that Forrest produces .pdf files for each and every web
page it processes. I can include the readme.pdf and install.pdf for both
PyLucene and JCC in the artifacts. The links in these documents don't work,
of course, but it's better than nothing.
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
I was afraid you would say that! OK I'll work up a patch ;)
Mike
Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;)
>
> Oh, I thought you were going to contribute them :)
>
> Andi..
>
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
> But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;)
Oh, I thought you were going to contribute them :)
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;)
Mike
Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
>> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
>> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
>>
>> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
>> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
>> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
>> the other subprojects do)
>
> Or heck, I can even include the entire site in HTML format, it's not that
> big, and change the README and INSTALL files to point at the local, offline,
> versions.
>
> Andi..
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
>
> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
Or heck, I can even include the entire site in HTML format, it's not that
big, and change the README and INSTALL files to point at the local, offline,
versions.
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
>
> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
I just remembered that Forrest produces .pdf files for each and every web
page it processes. I can include the readme.pdf and install.pdf for both
PyLucene and JCC in the artifacts. The links in these documents don't work,
of course, but it's better than nothing.
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
>
> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
> the other subprojects do)
Or heck, I can even include the entire site in HTML format, it's not that
big, and change the README and INSTALL files to point at the local, offline,
versions.
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
: avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
: moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
the other subprojects do)
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
: avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I
: moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn
I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be
easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be
included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of
the other subprojects do)
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> My one comment is regarding the documentation: the README and INSTALL
> files included in the release...
>
> ./README
> ./INSTALL
> ./jcc/README
> ./jcc/INSTALL
>
> ...are all simple one line files pointing people to URLs for HTML based
> documentation on the website. The release should really contain as much
> of the documentation as possible: both so people can review it offline,
> and so so that it is "preserved" and versioned with the releases even
> though the site may evolve over time. This isn't significant enough to
> really be a show stopper, but it's something to keep in mind for the
> future.
This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I moved
all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn [1], so all
of it is preserved and versioned, albeit not necessarily in sync with the
releases.
Andi..
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/pylucene/site
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> My one comment is regarding the documentation: the README and INSTALL
> files included in the release...
>
> ./README
> ./INSTALL
> ./jcc/README
> ./jcc/INSTALL
>
> ...are all simple one line files pointing people to URLs for HTML based
> documentation on the website. The release should really contain as much
> of the documentation as possible: both so people can review it offline,
> and so so that it is "preserved" and versioned with the releases even
> though the site may evolve over time. This isn't significant enough to
> really be a show stopper, but it's something to keep in mind for the
> future.
This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by
avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I moved
all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn [1], so all
of it is preserved and versioned, albeit not necessarily in sync with the
releases.
Andi..
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/pylucene/site
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area:
: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
:
: Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
: Thanks !
+0
I attempted to review the release, but my complete lack of knowledge about
python, and my computer's aparent lack of a gcc (not sure how i let that
happen) mean that I can't verify any of the build/install steps. or the
samples.
My one comment is regarding the documentation: the README and INSTALL
files included in the release...
./README
./INSTALL
./jcc/README
./jcc/INSTALL
...are all simple one line files pointing people to URLs for HTML based
documentation on the website. The release should really contain as much
of the documentation as possible: both so people can review it offline,
and so so that it is "preserved" and versioned with the releases even
though the site may evolve over time. This isn't significant enough to
really be a show stopper, but it's something to keep in mind for the
future.
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area:
: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
:
: Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
: Thanks !
+0
I attempted to review the release, but my complete lack of knowledge about
python, and my computer's aparent lack of a gcc (not sure how i let that
happen) mean that I can't verify any of the build/install steps. or the
samples.
My one comment is regarding the documentation: the README and INSTALL
files included in the release...
./README
./INSTALL
./jcc/README
./jcc/INSTALL
...are all simple one line files pointing people to URLs for HTML based
documentation on the website. The release should really contain as much
of the documentation as possible: both so people can review it offline,
and so so that it is "preserved" and versioned with the releases even
though the site may evolve over time. This isn't significant enough to
really be a show stopper, but it's something to keep in mind for the
future.
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
OK this resolved both of my issues below.
+1 to release!
Mike
Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> I tested what happens when I fail to call initVM, and unfortunately
>> I hit a SEGV (different from previous Bus Error):
>
> ... snip ...
>
>> This is the code:
>>
>> import lucene
>>
>> #lucene.initVM(lucene.CLASSPATH)
>>
>> store = lucene.FSDirectory.getDirectory('/lucene/test.idx')
>
> Yep, string conversions also needed to be protected, good catch.
>
>> Playing with it a bit, if I call:
>>
>> lucene.Document()
>>
>> I get the nice RuntimeError back telling me to initVM. But if I do
>> this instead:
>>
>> lucene.Document
>>
>> (don't apply it), then I hit a SEGV.
>
> I can't reproduce that one but maybe an earlier uncaught error had
> corrupted things.
>
> On the heels of this fix, lack of calling attachCurrentThread() now
> is also caught and reported with an error.
>
>> Sorry I didn't test out your fix until the RC...
>
> Better late than never. Thanks for doing this.
>
> I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I tested what happens when I fail to call initVM, and unfortunately I hit a
> SEGV (different from previous Bus Error):
... snip ...
> This is the code:
>
> import lucene
>
> #lucene.initVM(lucene.CLASSPATH)
>
> store = lucene.FSDirectory.getDirectory('/lucene/test.idx')
Yep, string conversions also needed to be protected, good catch.
> Playing with it a bit, if I call:
>
> lucene.Document()
>
> I get the nice RuntimeError back telling me to initVM. But if I do this
> instead:
>
> lucene.Document
>
> (don't apply it), then I hit a SEGV.
I can't reproduce that one but maybe an earlier uncaught error had corrupted
things.
On the heels of this fix, lack of calling attachCurrentThread() now is also
caught and reported with an error.
> Sorry I didn't test out your fix until the RC...
Better late than never. Thanks for doing this.
I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
Thanks !
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I tested what happens when I fail to call initVM, and unfortunately I hit a
> SEGV (different from previous Bus Error):
... snip ...
> This is the code:
>
> import lucene
>
> #lucene.initVM(lucene.CLASSPATH)
>
> store = lucene.FSDirectory.getDirectory('/lucene/test.idx')
Yep, string conversions also needed to be protected, good catch.
> Playing with it a bit, if I call:
>
> lucene.Document()
>
> I get the nice RuntimeError back telling me to initVM. But if I do this
> instead:
>
> lucene.Document
>
> (don't apply it), then I hit a SEGV.
I can't reproduce that one but maybe an earlier uncaught error had corrupted
things.
On the heels of this fix, lack of calling attachCurrentThread() now is also
caught and reported with an error.
> Sorry I didn't test out your fix until the RC...
Better late than never. Thanks for doing this.
I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
Thanks !
Andi..
Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Andi,
I tested what happens when I fail to call initVM, and unfortunately I
hit a SEGV (different from previous Bus Error):
Thread 0 Crashed:
0 libjcc.dylib 0x000ab4a6 JCCEnv::fromUTF(char
const*) + 50
1 _lucene.so 0x01303449 p2j(_object*) + 47
2 _lucene.so 0x01305096 _parseArgs(_object**,
unsigned int, char*, ...) + 5366
3 _lucene.so 0x010a0139
org::apache::lucene::store::t_FSDirectory_getDirectory(_typeobject*,
_object*) + 131
4 org.python.python 0x0018f51e PyEval_EvalFrameEx + 17116
5 org.python.python 0x00191173 PyEval_EvalCodeEx + 1638
6 org.python.python 0x00191260 PyEval_EvalCode + 87
7 org.python.python 0x001a883c PyErr_Display + 1896
8 org.python.python 0x001a8e66 PyRun_FileExFlags + 135
9 org.python.python 0x001aa7d2 PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags
+ 421
10 org.python.python 0x001b5a57 Py_Main + 3095
11 org.python.pythonapp 0x00001fca 0x1000 + 4042
This is the code:
import lucene
#lucene.initVM(lucene.CLASSPATH)
store = lucene.FSDirectory.getDirectory('/lucene/test.idx')
Playing with it a bit, if I call:
lucene.Document()
I get the nice RuntimeError back telling me to initVM. But if I do
this instead:
lucene.Document
(don't apply it), then I hit a SEGV.
Sorry I didn't test out your fix until the RC...
Mike
Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> Last week's vote failed to get the 3 PMC votes to make an official
> release. Only one PMC vote was cast, a +1 from Mike McCandless.
>
> In the meantime, some bugs were fixed and PyLucene 2.4.1 RC5 was
> uploaded to the staging area:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..