You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lenya.apache.org by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org> on 2004/12/04 06:14:10 UTC
difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
the sitemaps of both 1.2 and trunk have
<map:serializer name="html" logger="sitemap.serializer.html"
mime-type="text/html" pool-grow="4" pool-max="32"
pool-min="4" src="org.apache.cocoon.serialization.HTMLSerializer">
<doctype-public>-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN</doctype-public>
<doctype-system>http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd</doctype-system>
<buffer-size>1024</buffer-size>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
</map:serializer>
<!-- This serializer (Cocoon-2.1.5) has an issue with namespaces -->
<!--
<map:serializer name="html" logger="sitemap.serializer.html"
mime-type="text/html" pool-grow="4" pool-max="32"
pool-min="4"
src="org.apache.cocoon.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer">
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
</map:serializer>
-->
from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by antonio.
which serializer should be used, then?
--
Gregor J. Rothfuss
COO, Wyona Content Management Solutions http://wyona.com
Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org
gregor.rothfuss@wyona.com gregor@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializerand
o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> interestingly, when i switched in trunk, both the menu weirdness michi
> had reported and some utf-8 problems on the sitetree vanished.
>
> on the downside, the output contains things like
>
> <xhtml:p xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
> xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
> xmlns:lenya="http://apache.org/cocoon/lenya/page-envelope/1.0">The XHTML
> Doctype is for situations where users ask for complete freedom on what
> information can be inserted into a document. While this approach
> doesn't restrict you, it also looses some of the major benefits of
> well defined document types.</xhtml:p>
>
> so we need to make sure all namespaces are stripped.
i tried (unsuccessfully) to apply strip_namespaces to deal with this, so
for the meantime,
i set the serializer to html. once we have a better understanding of
this we should take a second look.
--
Gregor J. Rothfuss
COO, Wyona Content Management Solutions http://wyona.com
Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org
gregor.rothfuss@wyona.com gregor@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializerand
o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
>>o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
>>serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
>
>
> +1 to use(test) them in the default trunk.
interestingly, when i switched in trunk, both the menu weirdness michi
had reported and some utf-8 problems on the sitetree vanished.
on the downside, the output contains things like
<xhtml:p xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:lenya="http://apache.org/cocoon/lenya/page-envelope/1.0">The XHTML
Doctype is for situations where users ask for complete freedom on what
information can be inserted into a document. While this approach
doesn't restrict you, it also looses some of the major benefits of
well defined document types.</xhtml:p>
so we need to make sure all namespaces are stripped.
--
Gregor J. Rothfuss
COO, Wyona Content Management Solutions http://wyona.com
Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org
gregor.rothfuss@wyona.com gregor@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializerand
o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Vie, 3 de Diciembre de 2004, 23:16, Gregor J. Rothfuss dijo:
>
>>Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>
>>>from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by antonio.
>>>which serializer should be used, then?
>>
>>i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
>>o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
>>serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
>
>
> +1 to use(test) them in the default trunk.
+1
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between
o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializerand
o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
On Vie, 3 de Diciembre de 2004, 23:16, Gregor J. Rothfuss dijo:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by antonio.
>> which serializer should be used, then?
>
> i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
> o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
> serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
+1 to use(test) them in the default trunk.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer
and o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by
>> antonio. which serializer should be used, then?
>
>
> i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
> o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
> serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
+1 for trunk (1.4)
Michi
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer
and o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by Rolf Kulemann <ro...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 06:16, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
> > from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by antonio.
> > which serializer should be used, then?
>
> i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
> o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
> serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
+1 for trunk test.
--
Rolf Kulemann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org
Re: difference between o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer
and o.a.c.serialization.HTMLSerializer?
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> from what i understand, said issue has been fixed in 2.1.6 by antonio.
> which serializer should be used, then?
i assume o.a.c.components.serializers.HTMLSerializer and
o.a.c.components.serializers.XMLSerializer is pier's improved
serializer. anyone against using those in trunk by default?
--
Gregor J. Rothfuss
COO, Wyona Content Management Solutions http://wyona.com
Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org
gregor.rothfuss@wyona.com gregor@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Apache Lenya Project http://lenya.apache.org