Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] accept derby client contribution

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>]

Since it has its own table of contents, which forrest wants to generate, 
I recommend posting it as is (like Sunitha's paper at 
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/DOTS_Derby.html). If you let forrest 
process it, I'm not quite sure what you'll end up with.

  -jean


Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
> Hi Susan,
> 
> Thanks for taking this up. I am OK with your suggestion. Should it be 
> forrest generated or posted as is? May be we could put the current 
> version for now and then modify it later? ;-)
> 
> Satheesh
> 
> Susan Cline wrote:
> 
>> Hi Satheesh,
>>  
>> I can get this ready for Jean to commit.
>>  
>> I was thinking it could go under the 'Papers' tab, 
>> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/papers/index.html,
>> and we could create a new category called 'Derby Network Client'.  It 
>> wouldn't be
>> appropriate under the 'Derby Engine' section.  Or, we could have a new 
>> 'Functional Spec'
>> category where any future Functional Spec for anything could go as well.
>>  
>> Do either of those sound okay?  If not, please suggest where you would 
>> like the functional
>> spec to go.
>>  
>> Susan
>>
>> */Satheesh Bandaram <sa...@Sourcery.Org>/* wrote:
>>
>>     Submitted Derby client source to trunk. Post any problems you notice
>>     with Derby client.
>>
>>     Enjoy! Please use the functional spec for usage. I will work with Jean
>>     to host it at Derby website.
>>
>>     Satheesh
>>