You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk> on 2012/06/14 10:26:26 UTC
To: header
Hello
Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
To: header?
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
Den 2012-06-14 13:08, Niamh Holding skrev:
> A> grep -r HAS_SUBJECT /var/lib/spamassassin/*
>
> And that will tell me if there's a test for the To: headrer?
nope it shows a rule for inspiration :=)
Re: To: header
Posted by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk>.
Hello Axb,
Thursday, June 14, 2012, 11:55:06 AM, you wrote:
A> grep -r HAS_SUBJECT /var/lib/spamassassin/*
And that will tell me if there's a test for the To: headrer?
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 06/14/2012 10:26 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
> To: header?
>
grep -r HAS_SUBJECT /var/lib/spamassassin/*
Re: To: header
Posted by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk>.
Hello Axb,
Thursday, June 14, 2012, 11:56:12 AM, you wrote:
A> grep -r HAS_TO /var/lib/spamassassin/*
Easy, when one knows that it exists :)
So no score assigned to a simple missing To: header as all that finds
is a meta.
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk>.
Hello Axb,
Thursday, June 14, 2012, 1:15:45 PM, you wrote:
A> Now, you'll use one of those rules, saved you from creating it yourself
A> and having to keep it alive locally so you've just made it worth
A> mantaining the file :)
Actually I was creating a specific "Empty to" rule and know that from
past experience that To =~ /^\s*$/ hits where the To: header doesn't
exist.
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 06/14/2012 02:04 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello Axb,
>
> Thursday, June 14, 2012, 12:41:37 PM, you wrote:
>
> A> What's the problem if it is being used by other meta tests?
>
> Did I say it was?
>
> A> Have you looked at the file which includes that rule?
>
> Base __HAS_* rules for meta rules
>
> Which adds nothing to the observation that a rule in the file is not
> used elsewhere.
>
and you read further which states:
# According to Bug 6781
which you found at
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6781
and reading thru the whole irrelevant blah you found an entry
AXB 2012-05-17 16:59:11 UTC
These rules are there to be used in metas, by either users or rule devs
in sandboxes at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/ as
base rules ( 10_hasbase.cf naming) and avoid these rules being created
multiple times all over the place which creates "floating" dependencies.
Now, you'll use one of those rules, saved you from creating it yourself
and having to keep it alive locally so you've just made it worth
mantaining the file :)
Re: To: header
Posted by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk>.
Hello Axb,
Thursday, June 14, 2012, 12:41:37 PM, you wrote:
A> What's the problem if it is being used by other meta tests?
Did I say it was?
A> Have you looked at the file which includes that rule?
Base __HAS_* rules for meta rules
Which adds nothing to the observation that a rule in the file is not
used elsewhere.
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 06/14/2012 01:12 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello Axb,
>
> Thursday, June 14, 2012, 11:56:12 AM, you wrote:
>
> A> grep -r HAS_TO /var/lib/spamassassin/*
>
> And a test that isn't used in any meta tests is what I meant to say.
What's the problem if it is being used by other meta tests?
Have you looked at the file which includes that rule?
Re: To: header
Posted by Niamh Holding <ni...@fullbore.co.uk>.
Hello Axb,
Thursday, June 14, 2012, 11:56:12 AM, you wrote:
A> grep -r HAS_TO /var/lib/spamassassin/*
And a test that isn't used in any meta tests is what I meant to say.
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
Re: To: header
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 06/14/2012 10:26 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
> To: header?
>
sorry...
grep -r HAS_TO /var/lib/spamassassin/*
Re: To: header
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
Den 2012-06-14 10:26, Niamh Holding skrev:
> Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
> To: header?
header exists_to exists:to
spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t spammsg | grep -ri to: | less
Re: To: header
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:26:26 +0100
Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
> To: header?
>
header MISSING_HEADERS eval:check_for_missing_to_header()
Re: To: header
Posted by Cédric Jeanneret <cj...@tengu.ch>.
On 14.06.2012 10:26, Niamh Holding wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is there a rule like HAS_SUBJECT that tests for the presence of the
> To: header?
Hello,
I have this kind of stuff in my rules:
header H_INTIMATE Subject =~ /C.?a.?n y.?o.?u.? remember me.+ w.?e.+
intimate/i
"Subject" is part of the mail header.
Cheers,
C.