You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-issues@incubator.apache.org by "Matt Cooper (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org> on 2006/06/21 21:23:29 UTC
[jira] Created: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Facet display name vs. default handling
---------------------------------------
Key: ADFFACES-33
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
Type: Bug
Components: Build
Environment: Facet metadata
Reporter: Matt Cooper
Priority: Trivial
The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Posted by "Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]
Matthias Weßendorf reassigned ADFFACES-33:
------------------------------------------
Assign To: Matthias Weßendorf
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Posted by "Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthias Weßendorf updated ADFFACES-33:
---------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-incubating-core
Affects Version/s: 1.0.0-incubating-core
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0-incubating-core
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Assigned To: Matthias Weßendorf
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0-incubating-core
>
> Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Posted by "Matt Cooper (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]
Matt Cooper updated ADFFACES-33:
--------------------------------
Attachment: adf-faces.patch
Patch for removal of the facet display-name entries.
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Posted by "Matt Cooper (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]
Matt Cooper updated ADFFACES-33:
--------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Priority: Trivial
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
Posted by "Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]
Matthias Weßendorf closed ADFFACES-33:
--------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
thanks MATT for the patch
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira