You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com> on 2026/04/23 12:56:15 UTC

Re: [DISCUSS] Housekeeping: cleanup of feature branches in OFBiz repositories

Hi all,

I have completed this task.

Jacopo

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 1:11 PM Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappellato@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose a small housekeeping task: cleaning up feature
> branches in the official GitHub repositories (ofbiz-framework,
> ofbiz-plugins, ofbiz-site).
>
> Many of these branches seem inactive and can make navigation confusing.
> The proposal is to:
>
>    - remove all feature branches
>    - keep only the default branches (trunk/master), release branches
>    (release*), and dependabot branches (dependabot/*)
>
> No work would be lost: anyone still interested in a branch can pull it
> into their own fork before the cleanup.
>
> If there are no objections, we could proceed after a short grace period.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jacopo
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Housekeeping: cleanup of feature branches in OFBiz repositories

Posted by "gil.portenseigne" <gi...@nereide.fr>.
Thank you Jacopo !

gil
Le 23/04/26 02:56, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> I have completed this task.
> 
> Jacopo
> 
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 1:11 PM Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappellato@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to propose a small housekeeping task: cleaning up feature
> > branches in the official GitHub repositories (ofbiz-framework,
> > ofbiz-plugins, ofbiz-site).
> >
> > Many of these branches seem inactive and can make navigation confusing.
> > The proposal is to:
> >
> >    - remove all feature branches
> >    - keep only the default branches (trunk/master), release branches
> >    (release*), and dependabot branches (dependabot/*)
> >
> > No work would be lost: anyone still interested in a branch can pull it
> > into their own fork before the cleanup.
> >
> > If there are no objections, we could proceed after a short grace period.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >