You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2008/04/23 21:19:24 UTC
[DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Apr 24, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Um, this is really where they belong those, since they are specific
>> to Geronimo. But it should be possible to generate the resources w/
>> o license details... but probably have to use the new archetype-ng
>> stuff, which is on my list todo actually...
>
> I agree that this is where they belong.
>
> I'm not sure I understand Dave's issue. If the files were
> substantially changed to be non-Geronimo specific archetypes, then
> IMO, there'd have been enough change that they prolly would no
> longer be covered under our license...
I guess my thinking only applies to the plugin archetype. Lets say
someone writes some gbeans and comes up with a plugin using them that
doesn't include any apache code. Suppose they want to license the
plugin under say lgpl. With the apache license headers in the
archetype templates, do they have to include an Apache notice with
their plugin?
-- compiled plugin: maybe, the archetype has a bunch of hints about
how to get the car-maven-plugin to generate the geronimo-plugin.xml,
which goes into the plugin
-- source: yes, the generated pom will have apache license headers in
it.
Is this desirable?
thanks
david jencks
>
>
> --kevan
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Um, this is really where they belong those, since they are specific
> to Geronimo. But it should be possible to generate the resources w/
> o license details... but probably have to use the new archetype-ng
> stuff, which is on my list todo actually...
I agree that this is where they belong.
I'm not sure I understand Dave's issue. If the files were
substantially changed to be non-Geronimo specific archetypes, then
IMO, there'd have been enough change that they prolly would no longer
be covered under our license...
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Um, this is really where they belong those, since they are specific to
Geronimo. But it should be possible to generate the resources w/o
license details... but probably have to use the new archetype-ng
stuff, which is on my list todo actually...
--jason
On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Maybe apache is not the place for these archetypes. I don't want
> users of these archetypes to have to include a NOTICE file crediting
> apache simply because they kick-started their project by using these
> archetypes before doing all the customization to actually make them
> work.
>
> Should I move them to a codehaus mojo?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>>> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>>>>
>>>> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>>>> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
>>>> missing src license headers :-(
>>>> --kevan
>>>
>>> Thanks Kevan. I'm anxiously awaiting your list.
>>>
>>> I will copy the user list on the next rev of the vote.
>>
>> svn ci --message "Update files missing src license headers. Most
>> were added post-2.1.0. One was a reverted change post-2.1.0."
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/pom.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/
>> main/resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/
>> main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/
>> main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
>> resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
>> resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
>> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
>> resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
>> Sending 2.1/framework/modules/geronimo-commands/src/test/
>> resources/etc/aliases.xml
>> Sending 2.1/plugins/monitoring/mconsole-ear/src/main/
>> resources/MonitoringClientDB.sql
>> Transmitting file data .........
>> Committed revision 651078.
>>
>> 'merge -r 651077:651078 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1
>> .' should do the trick...
>>
>> --kevan
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Maybe apache is not the place for these archetypes. I don't want
users of these archetypes to have to include a NOTICE file crediting
apache simply because they kick-started their project by using these
archetypes before doing all the customization to actually make them
work.
Should I move them to a codehaus mojo?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 23, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>>>
>>> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>>> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
>>> missing src license headers :-(
>>> --kevan
>>
>> Thanks Kevan. I'm anxiously awaiting your list.
>>
>> I will copy the user list on the next rev of the vote.
>
> svn ci --message "Update files missing src license headers. Most
> were added post-2.1.0. One was a reverted change post-2.1.0."
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/pom.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
> resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
> resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
> resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
> resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
> resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
> resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
> Sending 2.1/framework/modules/geronimo-commands/src/test/
> resources/etc/aliases.xml
> Sending 2.1/plugins/monitoring/mconsole-ear/src/main/
> resources/MonitoringClientDB.sql
> Transmitting file data .........
> Committed revision 651078.
>
> 'merge -r 651077:651078 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1
> .' should do the trick...
>
> --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>>>
>>> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>>> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
>>> missing src license headers :-(
>>> --kevan
>>
>> Thanks Kevan. I'm anxiously awaiting your list.
>>
>> I will copy the user list on the next rev of the vote.
>
> svn ci --message "Update files missing src license headers. Most were
> added post-2.1.0. One was a reverted change post-2.1.0."
> Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/pom.xml
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
>
> Sending
> 2.1/framework/modules/geronimo-commands/src/test/resources/etc/aliases.xml
> Sending
> 2.1/plugins/monitoring/mconsole-ear/src/main/resources/MonitoringClientDB.sql
>
> Transmitting file data .........
> Committed revision 651078.
>
> 'merge -r 651077:651078
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1 .' should
> do the trick...
Thanks Kevan. Already integrated into the 2.1.1 branch. I'll rebuild,
generate new images, src, etc ... and start a new vote thread.
Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>>
>> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
>> missing src license headers :-(
>> --kevan
>
> Thanks Kevan. I'm anxiously awaiting your list.
>
> I will copy the user list on the next rev of the vote.
svn ci --message "Update files missing src license headers. Most were
added post-2.1.0. One was a reverted change post-2.1.0."
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/pom.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-assembly-archetype/src/main/
resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
resources/archetype-resources/pom.sample.xml
Sending 2.1/buildsupport/geronimo-plugin-archetype/src/main/
resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
Sending 2.1/framework/modules/geronimo-commands/src/test/
resources/etc/aliases.xml
Sending 2.1/plugins/monitoring/mconsole-ear/src/main/resources/
MonitoringClientDB.sql
Transmitting file data .........
Committed revision 651078.
'merge -r 651077:651078 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1
.' should do the trick...
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>
>
> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>
> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files missing
> src license headers :-(
>
> --kevan
Thanks Kevan. I'm anxiously awaiting your list.
I will copy the user list on the next rev of the vote.
Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Barf... I'll see if I can make the ianal-maven-plugin check for this
> ASAP...
That'd be good. Was going to add that. However, I think a release
manager should still run RAT and make the report available for
inspection by reviewers. I've found problems that the maven plugin was
not identifying...
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Barf... I'll see if I can make the ianal-maven-plugin check for this
ASAP...
--jason
On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:04 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>>
>
> We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
>
> Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
> missing src license headers :-(
>
> --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Discussion thread for the Geronimo 2.1.1 Release vote.
>
We should make a habit of cc:'ing user list on release votes.
Looking things over now. Afraid that there are some source files
missing src license headers :-(
--kevan