You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org> on 2007/10/22 12:40:54 UTC

Microsoft Exchange - HTTP-DAV ?

I've recently begun to see a number of FPs due to Windows Mobile clients
not adding an X-Mailer: (as far as I can determine):

This pretty much gives an automatic 5.4 points:

*  2.2 MSGID_DOLLARS Message-Id has pattern used in spam
*  1.9 RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME Bulk email fingerprint (Outlook no name)
*      found
*  1.4 RATWARE_MS_HASH Bulk email fingerprint (msgid ms hash) found


Has anyone seen something similar or?


/Per Jessen, Zürich

Re: Microsoft Exchange - HTTP-DAV ?

Posted by James Oulman <ou...@UFL.EDU>.

Per Jessen wrote:
> I've recently begun to see a number of FPs due to Windows Mobile clients
> not adding an X-Mailer: (as far as I can determine):
> 
> This pretty much gives an automatic 5.4 points:
> 
> *  2.2 MSGID_DOLLARS Message-Id has pattern used in spam
> *  1.9 RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME Bulk email fingerprint (Outlook no name)
> *      found
> *  1.4 RATWARE_MS_HASH Bulk email fingerprint (msgid ms hash) found
> 
> 
> Has anyone seen something similar or?
> 
> 
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
> 
> 

This is fixed in 3.2.

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5277

You could also do something like

meta MY_OUTLOOK_MOBILE_WORKAROUND ( MSGID_DOLLARS && RATWARE_MS_HASH && 
RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME )
score MY_OUTLOOK_MOBILE_WORKAROUND -3.0
describe MY_OUTLOOK_MOBILE_WORKAROUND outlook mobile clients do not 
include the x-mailer header, boo.

Though, someone will likely tell me why the above is a bad idea =)

-James