Feedback about the sgi patches issue. (vol 3)

[Ben Hyde <bh...@pobox.com>]

Three more messages from the larger community posted to new-httpd over
the last few days.  Ezmlm is configured to divert postings from
non-subscribers to the moderator, that's currently me.  I have replied
to all of these.

  - ben

------------------------
Message-ID: <3A...@mediaone.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:53:58 -0500
From: toy <ge...@mediaone.net>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: support

Just voicing my support for sgi's speed patches for APache, I hope the 
code can somehow be incorporated.  It seems like it would benefit both 
parties.  Great work with apache.  Thank you for listening.
Jason Toy
-------------------------
Message-ID: <A7...@roscoe.burstmedia.com>
From: Travis Roy <tr...@burstmedia.com>
To: "'new-httpd@apache.org'" <ne...@apache.org>
Subject: SGI's Apache patches
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:08:13 -0500

I just found out about the SGI's patches for Apache. Why were they not
included in the main stream distribution? They seem to work, and work good.
-------------------------
From: "Dan Daffer" <dd...@helixelectric.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:50:45 -0800
Subject: sgi patches
Message-ID: <3A...@localhost>

You guys must be insane...

Work it out brothers! "Just say no" is for kids and drugs, not for 
improving software projects.
                                       
                        ..     .  
                   ...               .
                ....
              ......
            ..........
        .................
    ...........................
 ........................................
.........................................................
Dan Daffer
ddaffer@helixelectric.com