[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14490) [RpcServer] reuse request read buffer

["Elliott Clark (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15143877#comment-15143877 ] 

Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-14490:
---------------------------------------

Unless there is a noticeable benefit, is there a reason to try and defeat the GC? Short lived objects are very very cheap with newer jvm's and adding complexity that would be disabled for people running a newer jvm seems weird.


> [RpcServer] reuse request read buffer
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14490
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: IPC/RPC
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Zephyr Guo
>            Assignee: Zephyr Guo
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.2
>
>         Attachments: 14490.hack.to.1.2.patch, ByteBufferPool.java, HBASE-14490-v1.patch, HBASE-14490-v10.patch, HBASE-14490-v11.patch, HBASE-14490-v12.patch, HBASE-14490-v2.patch, HBASE-14490-v3.patch, HBASE-14490-v4.patch, HBASE-14490-v5.patch, HBASE-14490-v6.patch, HBASE-14490-v7.patch, HBASE-14490-v8.patch, HBASE-14490-v9.patch, gc.png, hits.png, test-v12-patch
>
>
> Reusing buffer to read request.It's not necessary to every request free buffer.The idea of optimization is to reduce the times that allocate ByteBuffer.
> *Modification*
> 1. {{saslReadAndProcess}} ,{{processOneRpc}}, {{processUnwrappedData}}, {{processConnectionHeader}} accept a ByteBuffer instead of byte[].They can move {{ByteBuffer.position}} correctly when we have read the data.
> 2. {{processUnwrappedData}} no longer use any extra memory.
> 3. Maintaining a buffer pool in each {{Connection}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)