You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2012/02/29 22:41:43 UTC

[VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Hi,

Here is the vote on a release build for Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

--------------

Main changes from RC-4:

+ Added license to scripts, and XML files.
   small test files don't have a license; test manifests do.
+ New layout of dist/

http://markmail.org/message/oh5stsl2ikbslobs

--------------

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-001/

Proposed dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating-RC-5/

Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS

SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/TDB/tags/jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating-RC-5/

The module is tagged with the version and "RC-5" to indicate the release 
candidate in this release cycle.  If voted on successfully, the tag will 
be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus the RC designation.

Please vote to approve this release:

   [ ] +1 Approve the release
   [ ]  0 Don't care
   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until:

   Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
   (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).

     Andy

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

+1

>
> This vote will be open until:
>
> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>
> Andy


Re: [Process] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> This vote will be open until:
>
> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).


If the vote is going well (independent +1's, one mentor, no outstanding 
comments), I think we should start the general@i vote in parallel.  This 
is a "clearing up after IPMC comments" release.

(I think that is possible - shout if it isn't not done or is a bad idea)

	Andy

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
(should have done this earlier - sorry)

Result of the vote for release of Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5) on jena-dev:

The vote passes.

+1 votes: 4

PPMC votes:

Andy Seaborne
Dave Reynolds
Benson Margulies (IPMC)
Damian Steer

0 votes: none

-1 votes: none

Call for the VOTE email and thread:
Vote started 2012-02-29:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-dev/201202.mbox/%3C4F4E9B97.7060901%40apache.org%3E

Currently:

We are now waiting on general@i -- we have one extra IPMC vote (ant 
elder) there and so need one more.

	Andy

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 04/03/12 20:49, Ian Dickinson wrote:
> On 04/03/12 19:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open until:
>>>
>>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>>
>> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
> Sorry Andy, I've been digging myself out of other holes. I see you have
> Benson and Damian's vote, but I could look at the RC later if you like.
>
> Ian
>

No problem - I didn't leave much gap in the schedule and not everyone 
can find a slot to check at short notice.

(We can discuss later whether the checking can be split up so that we 
make sure we get proper coverage but without undue duplication.)

	Andy

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Ian Dickinson <ia...@epimorphics.com>.
On 04/03/12 19:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open until:
>>
>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>
> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
Sorry Andy, I've been digging myself out of other holes. I see you have 
Benson and Damian's vote, but I could look at the RC later if you like.

Ian


Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 04/03/12 20:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Andy Seaborne<an...@apache.org>  wrote:
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open until:
>>>
>>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>>
>>
>> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
>>
>>         Andy
>>

Great - onto the next step now.

	Andy


Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open until:
>>
>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>
>
> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
>
>        Andy
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 04/03/12 20:13, Damian Steer wrote:
>
> On 4 Mar 2012, at 19:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open until:
>>>
>>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>>
>> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
>>
>> 	Andy
>>
>
>
> Sorry, mail server connection went south.

The VirginMedia [*] van has been up and down our road several times today.

	Andy

>
> +1
>
> Damian

[*] Bristol's cable provider.

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Damian Steer <d....@bristol.ac.uk>.
On 4 Mar 2012, at 19:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:

>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> 
>> This vote will be open until:
>> 
>> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
>> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).
> 
> We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).
> 
> 	Andy
> 


Sorry, mail server connection went south.

+1

Damian

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open until:
>
> Saturday 3/March 23:59 UTC
> (3 whole days: 72 hours from the same hour tonight).

We need another vote : we currently have 2 +1's (Andy and Dave).

	Andy


Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 02/03/12 11:41, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On 29/02/12 21:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> +1

Thank you.

>
> [Checked signatures, NOTICE et al, source buildable, tests pass,
> directory structure meets i-g list requests.
> A naive
> grep -L "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation"
> threw up shell scripts in bin and bin-test but those do have short-form
> license headers.]

I have been grep'ping  for the URL:
    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

I've also run the RAT over the source-release files.

	Andy

>
> Dave

Hmm -- the version number of RAT does not include "-incubator" in the 
jar version number, but is in the binaries and sources filename.

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

Posted by Dave Reynolds <da...@gmail.com>.
On 29/02/12 21:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

+1

[Checked signatures, NOTICE et al, source buildable, tests pass, 
directory structure meets i-g list requests.
  A naive
     grep -L "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation"
threw up shell scripts in bin and bin-test but those do have short-form 
license headers.]

Dave