You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Mario Pastorelli (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/16 22:12:20 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4375) Add missing Key constructors
taking array of bytes as argument
Mario Pastorelli created ACCUMULO-4375:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Add missing Key constructors taking array of bytes as argument
Key: ACCUMULO-4375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4375
Project: Accumulo
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core
Reporter: Mario Pastorelli
In my company we use {{Key}} built directly from {{byte[]}} instead of {{Text}}. Currently {{Key}} has many constructors working with {{Text}} and only few working with {{byte[]}}. You can still use the {{Text}}-based constructor to create a {{Key}} from a {{byte[]}} by wrapping it into a {{Text}}, but this requires to box a {{byte[]}} into {{Text}} without any good reason.
I propose to add the missing {{byte[]}}-based {{Key}} constructors, which are:
{code:java}
Key(byte[] row)
Key(byte[] row, long ts)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, byte[] cv)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, long ts)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, ColumnVisibility cv, long ts)
{code}
The new constructor should behave like the {{Text}}-based counterpart, for instance:
{code:java}
byte[] row = new byte[] {0};
assertEquals(new Key(row), new Key(new Text(row)));
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)