You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by ma...@apache.org on 2002/11/27 16:55:19 UTC
cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod mod_speling.xml
martin 2002/11/27 07:55:19
Modified: docs/manual/mod mod_speling.xml
Log:
Caveat when using mod_speling in a DAV-enabled directory
Revision Changes Path
1.4 +7 -0 httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod/mod_speling.xml
Index: mod_speling.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod/mod_speling.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- mod_speling.xml 23 May 2002 14:50:11 -0000 1.3
+++ mod_speling.xml 27 Nov 2002 15:55:19 -0000 1.4
@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
get incorrectly treated as the negotiated file
"<code>/stats.html</code>".</li>
</ul>
+
+ <p>mod_speling should not be enabled in <a href="mod_dav.html">DAV</a>
+ enabled directories, because it will try to "spell fix" newly created
+ resource names against existing filenames, e.g., when trying to upload
+ a new document <code>doc43.html</code> it might redirect to an existing
+ document <code>doc34.html</code>, which is not what was intended.
+ </p>
</usage>
</directivesynopsis>
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod mod_speling.xml
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 martin@apache.org wrote:
> martin 2002/11/27 07:55:19
>
> Modified: docs/manual/mod mod_speling.xml
> Log:
> Caveat when using mod_speling in a DAV-enabled directory
Ewww. Isn't that a bug that should be fixed? Shouldn't mod_speling punt
on anything other than GET?
Joshua.
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod mod_speling.xml
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* martin@apache.org wrote:
> + <p>mod_speling should not be enabled in <a href="mod_dav.html">DAV</a>
> + enabled directories, because it will try to "spell fix" newly created
> + resource names against existing filenames, e.g., when trying to upload
> + a new document <code>doc43.html</code> it might redirect to an existing
> + document <code>doc34.html</code>, which is not what was intended.
> + </p>
hmm, really?
/* We only want to worry about GETs */
if (r->method_number != M_GET) {
return DECLINED;
}
a dav upload is not done with GET, so how is mod_speling involved?
nd
--
Da fällt mir ein, wieso gibt es eigentlich in Unicode kein
"i" mit einem Herzchen als Tüpfelchen? Das wär sooo süüss!
-- Björn Höhrmann in darw