You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rs...@engelschall.com> on 1999/11/17 10:19:25 UTC
Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES
In article <19...@hyperreal.org> you wrote:
> wsanchez 99/11/16 18:25:08
>
> Modified: . configure
> src CHANGES
> Log:
> Add --with-port option.
> Submitted by: Ian Kallen <sp...@salon.com>
> + --with-port=*)
> + echo "Using port $apc_optarg"
> + port="$apc_optarg"
> + ;;
Do you really think it's important to print this? I personally would
appreciate that we don't do this, because this info is not such important. Or
in other words: For consistency, either print also similar things or print
none of them. But just to print the port is confusing IMHO.
Ralf S. Engelschall
rse@engelschall.com
www.engelschall.com
Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>...
> > + --with-port=*)
> > + echo "Using port $apc_optarg"
> > + port="$apc_optarg"
> > + ;;
>
> Do you really think it's important to print this? I personally would
> appreciate that we don't do this, because this info is not such important. Or
> in other words: For consistency, either print also similar things or print
> none of them. But just to print the port is confusing IMHO.
Good eye, Ralf! :-) Agreed. This is simply a replication of what the
person typed on the command line! Why print what they already know?
+1 on nuking the "echo" line.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/