You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/07/03 19:01:15 UTC
[jira] Created: (JCR-1001) SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of
specialized subclasses
SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: JCR-1001
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SPI
Reporter: angela
Assignee: angela
Priority: Minor
in the F2F we agreed that the SPI should rather use 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclassed (or RangeIterator).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (JCR-1001) SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of
specialized subclasses
Posted by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510310 ]
angela commented on JCR-1001:
-----------------------------
slightly modified contrib/jackrabbit-spi-xml in order not to break its compilation (untested).
rev. 553411
> SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Minor
>
> in the F2F we agreed that the SPI should rather use 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclassed (or RangeIterator).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (JCR-1001) SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of
specialized subclasses
Posted by "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jukka Zitting updated JCR-1001:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.4
> SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> in the F2F we agreed that the SPI should rather use 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclassed (or RangeIterator).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (JCR-1001) SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of
specialized subclasses
Posted by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
angela resolved JCR-1001.
-------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
removed:
IdIterator, EventIterator, QNodeTypeDefinitionIterator, QResultRowIterator interfaces and
implementing classes.
All corresponding return values were changed to 'Iterator' except for QResultRowIterator which was changed to 'RangeIterator' due to usage of the additional methods within the query code.
rev. 553409
> SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Minor
>
> in the F2F we agreed that the SPI should rather use 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclassed (or RangeIterator).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.