You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/05 02:02:57 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (HBASE-1751) Server vs. Client-side KeyValue

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

stack resolved HBASE-1751.
--------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: stack

Small change.  All other public-facing methods used client side had nice javadoc that differentiated used client-side vs server-side.  Just getValue was missing it.  Appled branch and trunk.

> Server vs. Client-side KeyValue
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1751
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1751
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 0.20.1
>
>
> Do we need a server-side and client-side version of KeyValue?
> One of the lads here was trying to write client-side code and got put off by javadoc that said "do not use this" (he wanted to getValue and didn't know ahead of time what columns the Result contained).  This would seem to say we need javadoc for server-side and then different javadoc for client-side.
> Holstad wants KV to be comparable.  We can't make KV comparable because at least on server-side, comparator to use changes with context.  If there was a server-side KV, then we could make that comparable and leave the server-side KV alone.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.