You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Grant Taylor <gt...@tnetconsulting.net> on 2020/07/21 18:06:43 UTC

OT: "...value judgement"

On 7/21/20 11:56 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
> All answers: "NO!" In those cases, "black" and "white" all reference 
> actual colors of physical things, not a metaphorical value judgment.

Hum.  Your "value judgement" statement is interesting.

The original meaning of blacklist that I found seems to be exactly that, 
a value judgement on if it was okay / safe to do business with people / 
businesses or not.  Specifically if someone (independent of race) was 
unsafe to do business with, they were added to the blacklist.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: OT: "...value judgement"

Posted by Charles Sprickman <sp...@bway.net>.

> On Jul 21, 2020, at 3:16 PM, Robert Schetterer <rs...@sys4.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 21.07.20 um 21:07 schrieb Bill Cole:
>> On 21 Jul 2020, at 14:06, Grant Taylor wrote:
>>> On 7/21/20 11:56 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>>> All answers: "NO!" In those cases, "black" and "white" all reference actual colors of physical things, not a metaphorical value judgment.
>>> 
>>> Hum.  Your "value judgement" statement is interesting.
>>> 
>>> The original meaning of blacklist that I found seems to be exactly that, a value judgement on if it was okay / safe to do business with people / businesses or not.  Specifically if someone (independent of race) was unsafe to do business with, they were added to the blacklist.
>> Precisely.
>> That usage is problematic because in many (most? all?) Anglophone societies, "Black" is an ethno-racial label. In some cases (UK, US, probably more) it is accepted and internalized as an identity by those thus labeled. This creates a naming collision with the usage of "black" and "white" as metaphorical labels for value judgments.
>> The degree of annoyance caused by that collision of connotations varies widely.
> 
> Hi @ll, can we focus on tec problems again ?

The thread is marked “OT” unlike the outbursts from the crew of warriors against “cultural marxism” that are crapping on every thread…

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> [*] sys4 AG
> 
> http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
> Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
> 
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
> Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein


Re: OT: "...value judgement"

Posted by Robert Schetterer <rs...@sys4.de>.
Am 21.07.20 um 21:07 schrieb Bill Cole:
> On 21 Jul 2020, at 14:06, Grant Taylor wrote:
> 
>> On 7/21/20 11:56 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> All answers: "NO!" In those cases, "black" and "white" all reference 
>>> actual colors of physical things, not a metaphorical value judgment.
>>
>> Hum.  Your "value judgement" statement is interesting.
>>
>> The original meaning of blacklist that I found seems to be exactly 
>> that, a value judgement on if it was okay / safe to do business with 
>> people / businesses or not.  Specifically if someone (independent of 
>> race) was unsafe to do business with, they were added to the blacklist.
> 
> Precisely.
> 
> That usage is problematic because in many (most? all?) Anglophone 
> societies, "Black" is an ethno-racial label. In some cases (UK, US, 
> probably more) it is accepted and internalized as an identity by those 
> thus labeled. This creates a naming collision with the usage of "black" 
> and "white" as metaphorical labels for value judgments.
> 
> The degree of annoyance caused by that collision of connotations varies 
> widely.
> 

Hi @ll, can we focus on tec problems again ?



-- 
[*] sys4 AG

http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München

Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein

Re: OT: "...value judgement"

Posted by Bill Cole <sa...@billmail.scconsult.com>.
On 21 Jul 2020, at 14:06, Grant Taylor wrote:

> On 7/21/20 11:56 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
>> All answers: "NO!" In those cases, "black" and "white" all reference 
>> actual colors of physical things, not a metaphorical value judgment.
>
> Hum.  Your "value judgement" statement is interesting.
>
> The original meaning of blacklist that I found seems to be exactly 
> that, a value judgement on if it was okay / safe to do business with 
> people / businesses or not.  Specifically if someone (independent of 
> race) was unsafe to do business with, they were added to the 
> blacklist.

Precisely.

That usage is problematic because in many (most? all?) Anglophone 
societies, "Black" is an ethno-racial label. In some cases (UK, US, 
probably more) it is accepted and internalized as an identity by those 
thus labeled. This creates a naming collision with the usage of "black" 
and "white" as metaphorical labels for value judgments.

The degree of annoyance caused by that collision of connotations varies 
widely.

-- 
Bill Cole
bill@scconsult.com or billcole@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not For Hire (currently)