You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Volker Kleinschmidt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/12 08:27:10 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4645) The lease-database-locker does not
work properly slave broker ssytem clock is behind Database server
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15001792#comment-15001792 ]
Volker Kleinschmidt commented on AMQ-4645:
------------------------------------------
Title is missing "if".
> The lease-database-locker does not work properly slave broker ssytem clock is behind Database server
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4645
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4645
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Message Store
> Affects Versions: 5.8.0
> Environment: jdbc master slave
> Reporter: Gary Tully
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Labels: clock, jdbc, lease, masterSlave
> Fix For: 5.9.0
>
>
> The lease locker can adjust the lease duration based on the DB current time but this only works if the broker is ahead of the Db.
> If the broker is behind, it will always obtain a lease due to incorrect adjustment.
> If the clocks are in sync there is no issue.{code}
> <persistenceAdapter>
> <jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataSource="#oracle-ds" lockKeepAlivePeriod="5000">
> <locker>
> <lease-database-locker lockAcquireSleepInterval="10000"/>
> </locker>
> </jdbcPersistenceAdapter>
> </persistenceAdapter>{code}
> The problem is that the negative diff is being treated as a positive diff.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)