Re: HTTP/2 configuration

[Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>]

On 12/12/2019 15:23, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Arief,
> 
> On 12/12/19 00:25, Arief Hasani wrote:
>> IMHO, being able to override form HTTP1.1 conf is all good as user
>> could easily assume that if not specified in the upgrade than use
>> http1.1 configs
> I'm not sure you understand the question.
> 
> Mark is asking if any users in the community are finding that they
> need to independently configure specific parts of the HTTP/<2 versus
> h2 *for the same port*.
> 
> Thinks like the compression, keepalives, max headers/trailers,
> timeouts, sendfile config, etc.
> 
> Does it ever make sense to have sendFile enabled on the HTTP/1.1
> connector but disable sendFile if the client upgrades to h2?

Exactly.

> The suspicion is that identical configuration is acceptable. Mark is
> trying to ask if there are any exceptions before we simplify the code
> which handles the configuration.
> 
> If you have a specific use-case, please explain.

Just pinging this thread in case there is someone with a specific use case.

At the moment, I'm leaning towards the simplification for Tomcat 10 onwards.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org

Re: HTTP/2 configuration

["M. Manna" <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hey Mark et. al.,

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 11:20, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 12/12/2019 15:23, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > Arief,
> >
> > On 12/12/19 00:25, Arief Hasani wrote:
> >> IMHO, being able to override form HTTP1.1 conf is all good as user
> >> could easily assume that if not specified in the upgrade than use
> >> http1.1 configs
> > I'm not sure you understand the question.
> >
> > Mark is asking if any users in the community are finding that they
> > need to independently configure specific parts of the HTTP/<2 versus
> > h2 *for the same port*.
> >
> > Thinks like the compression, keepalives, max headers/trailers,
> > timeouts, sendfile config, etc.
> >
> > Does it ever make sense to have sendFile enabled on the HTTP/1.1
> > connector but disable sendFile if the client upgrades to h2?
>
> Exactly.
>
> > The suspicion is that identical configuration is acceptable. Mark is
> > trying to ask if there are any exceptions before we simplify the code
> > which handles the configuration.
> >
> > If you have a specific use-case, please explain.
>
> Just pinging this thread in case there is someone with a specific use case.
>
> At the moment, I'm leaning towards the simplification for Tomcat 10
> onwards.
>

 It's probably better that way. The change here is big and a major release
such as 10.x is more appropriate for GA.


> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>