You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by "pramila_thakur@ontla.ola.org" <pr...@ontla.ola.org> on 2012/05/23 22:48:20 UTC

field compression in solr 3.6

Hi Everyone,

solr 3.6 does not seem to be honoring the field compress.

While merging the indexes the size of Index is very big. 

Is there any other way to  handle this to keep compression functionality?

thanks,

--Pramila

--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/field-compression-in-solr-3-6-tp3985780.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: field compression in solr 3.6

Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.
On 5/23/2012 2:48 PM, pramila_thakur@ontla.ola.org wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> solr 3.6 does not seem to be honoring the field compress.
>
> While merging the indexes the size of Index is very big.
>
> Is there any other way to  handle this to keep compression functionality?

Compression support was removed from Solr.  I am not clear on the 
reasons, but there was probably a good one.  The wiki says it happened 
in 1.4.1.

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Data_Types

There seems to be a patch to put compression back in, implemented in a 
different way that is not compatible with fields compressed in the old 
way.  The patch has not been committed to any Solr version.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-752

Thanks,
Shawn