You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by "pramila_thakur@ontla.ola.org" <pr...@ontla.ola.org> on 2012/05/23 22:48:20 UTC
field compression in solr 3.6
Hi Everyone,
solr 3.6 does not seem to be honoring the field compress.
While merging the indexes the size of Index is very big.
Is there any other way to handle this to keep compression functionality?
thanks,
--Pramila
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/field-compression-in-solr-3-6-tp3985780.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: field compression in solr 3.6
Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.
On 5/23/2012 2:48 PM, pramila_thakur@ontla.ola.org wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> solr 3.6 does not seem to be honoring the field compress.
>
> While merging the indexes the size of Index is very big.
>
> Is there any other way to handle this to keep compression functionality?
Compression support was removed from Solr. I am not clear on the
reasons, but there was probably a good one. The wiki says it happened
in 1.4.1.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Data_Types
There seems to be a patch to put compression back in, implemented in a
different way that is not compatible with fields compressed in the old
way. The patch has not been committed to any Solr version.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-752
Thanks,
Shawn