Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>]

I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>]

On 02/11/17 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.

Just a heads up that this might get pushed back a bit. I'm looking at
some Tomcat integration issues and there might be a need for some more
Java 9 related changes.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>]

This could be an argument that goes the way of source code formatting ;-)
but my simplest reasons are:
- It all lines up nicely all the time
- It hints that we intend to supply bug fix releases

Gary

On Nov 2, 2017 08:32, "Benedikt Ritter" <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Gary,
>
> > Am 02.11.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > How about calling it 1.1.0?
>
> See Emmanuels answer on the other thread. Why would we do that? :-)
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2017 07:33, "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
> >> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
> >> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
> >> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>]

Hi Gary,

> Am 02.11.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>:
> 
> How about calling it 1.1.0?

See Emmanuels answer on the other thread. Why would we do that? :-)

Regards,
Benedikt

> 
> Gary
> 
> On Nov 2, 2017 07:33, "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
>> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
>> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
>> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Emmanuel Bourg <eb...@apache.org>]

On 11/02/2017 03:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:

> I'm happy to go with the majority preference (mine being for 1.1.0).

I'm more concerned about consistency between releases than the actual
version format. commons-daemon has always used 3 digits, so 1.1.0 is
fine. But releasing lang 3.7.0 after 3.6 would look odd.

Emmanuel Bourg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>]

On 02/11/17 14:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> How about calling it 1.1.0?

That would be my preference.

I only went with 1.1 as that was the convention with other components.
That isn't a convention I agree with but neither is it very high up my
list of things I'm particularly bothered about.

I'm happy to go with the majority preference (mine being for 1.1.0).

Mark


> 
> Gary
> 
> On Nov 2, 2017 07:33, "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
>> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
>> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
>> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Tagging Daemon 1.1

[Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>]

How about calling it 1.1.0?

Gary

On Nov 2, 2017 07:33, "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am
> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads
> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag.
> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours.
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>