You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> on 2012/09/23 22:29:33 UTC
[DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin
Hi
In RAT-78 there is a request to upgrade to a newer version of Doxia.
That is a reasonable request given the fact that the current version we
are using is 1.0-alpha-8 which is *really* old.
Now, in order to decide which version of Doxia to use we need to first
define the minimum version of Maven we want to support. Currently our
plugin requires Maven 2.0.6 which came out in 2007. Over in Maven land
we currently target Maven 2.2.1 as the minimum version for our plugins.
The reason for this question is because different versions of Maven
comes with different versions of Doxia. This is an unfortunate hard
connection between the two, but starting with Maven 3 there are no
longer any direct dependencies on Doxia in Maven core. See this wiki
page for some history in the matter:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
We really only have two choices:
1. Require Maven 2.0.11 and use Doxia 1.0.x
2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
Unless anyone has strong objections I plan on going with option 2 here.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/24/12 12:35, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 23.09.2012 22:29, schrieb Dennis Lundberg:
>> 2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
>> technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
>
> +1 - no problem with modern environments.
+1
Robert
Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>.
Hi,
Am 23.09.2012 22:29, schrieb Dennis Lundberg:
> 2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
> technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
+1 - no problem with modern environments.
Cheers
Phil
Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Done, I went with Doxia 1.2.
I support that.
--
The best argument for celibacy is that the clergy will sooner or later
become extinct.
Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-09-23 22:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> In RAT-78 there is a request to upgrade to a newer version of Doxia.
> That is a reasonable request given the fact that the current version we
> are using is 1.0-alpha-8 which is *really* old.
>
> Now, in order to decide which version of Doxia to use we need to first
> define the minimum version of Maven we want to support. Currently our
> plugin requires Maven 2.0.6 which came out in 2007. Over in Maven land
> we currently target Maven 2.2.1 as the minimum version for our plugins.
>
> The reason for this question is because different versions of Maven
> comes with different versions of Doxia. This is an unfortunate hard
> connection between the two, but starting with Maven 3 there are no
> longer any direct dependencies on Doxia in Maven core. See this wiki
> page for some history in the matter:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
>
> We really only have two choices:
>
> 1. Require Maven 2.0.11 and use Doxia 1.0.x
>
> 2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
> technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
>
> Unless anyone has strong objections I plan on going with option 2 here.
Done, I went with Doxia 1.2.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: Rat 0.9 TODO [WAS Re: Release Rat ...?]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/24/12 00:40, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 21:59, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On 11/06/12 20:45, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-06 21:28, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I think so.
>>
>> How close are we now...?
>
> We're there.
> I've update a few Maven plugins to fix a few problems with the build.
:-)
>>>>> I have these things left on my todo list:
>>>>>
>>>>> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
>>
>> Consensus seems to be that this is good enough for now
>
> I agree.
:-)
>>>>> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
>>>>> they can be validated
>>
>> How much is left to do...?
>
> All done.
:-)
>>>>> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
>>>>> incubator any more
>>
>> I've reworked and published to
>> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
>
> I took it for a test drive and made a few minor tweaks.
:-)
Robert
Re: Rat 0.9 TODO [WAS Re: Release Rat ...?]
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-11-21 21:59, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 11/06/12 20:45, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2012-11-06 21:28, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think so.
>
> How close are we now...?
We're there.
I've update a few Maven plugins to fix a few problems with the build.
>>>> I have these things left on my todo list:
>>>>
>>>> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
>
> Consensus seems to be that this is good enough for now
I agree.
>>>> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
>>>> they can be validated
>
> How much is left to do...?
All done.
>>>> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
>>>> incubator any more
>
> I've reworked and published to
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
I took it for a test drive and made a few minor tweaks.
> Robert
--
Dennis Lundberg
Rat 0.9 TODO [WAS Re: Release Rat ...?]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/06/12 20:45, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-06 21:28, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think so.
How close are we now...?
>>> I have these things left on my todo list:
>>>
>>> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
Consensus seems to be that this is good enough for now
>>> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
>>> they can be validated
How much is left to do...?
>>> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
>>> incubator any more
I've reworked and published to
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
Robert
Re: [WAS Re: Release Rat ...?]
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-11-06 21:28, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>>
>> Yes, I think so. I have these things left on my todo list:
>>
>> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
>> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
>> they can be validated
>> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
>> incubator any more
>>
>> - Robert has assigned A to himself.
>
> I've regenerated the Rat subsite with the beginnings of some content for
> core[1]. Feedback welcomed :-)
Looks good to me.
> One of the problems posed by improving the documentation is that Rat
> core really needs a good refactor into a much simpler and conventional
> design. This would probably mean adding more integration tests before
> starting.
>
> There a balance that needs to be struck between better documentation
> about the current mess, and moving towards a more reasonable design.
>
> Opinions? Suggestions?
For now the documentation for Rat core is good enough. At least it is
about Rat core now :)
Going forward we can improve the docs as needed if/when a refactoring
takes place.
>
> Robert
> [1] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-core/index.html
--
Dennis Lundberg
[WAS Re: Release Rat ...?]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>
> Yes, I think so. I have these things left on my todo list:
>
> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
> they can be validated
> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
> incubator any more
>
> - Robert has assigned A to himself.
I've regenerated the Rat subsite with the beginnings of some content for
core[1]. Feedback welcomed :-)
One of the problems posed by improving the documentation is that Rat
core really needs a good refactor into a much simpler and conventional
design. This would probably mean adding more integration tests before
starting.
There a balance that needs to be struck between better documentation
about the current mess, and moving towards a more reasonable design.
Opinions? Suggestions?
Robert
[1] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-core/index.html
Re: Switch to maven-scm-publish-plugin [WAS Re: Maven SCM Publish
Plugin] ...?
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/18/12 19:33, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-18 11:01, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> Any objections to me switching the rat build to use
>> maven-scm-publish-plugin for site generation and updating the
>> documentation?
>
> No objections from me. Go ahead.
Taking a look now...
Robert
Improved Site Publication Documentation [WAS Re: Switch to maven-scm-publish-plugin]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/18/12 19:33, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-18 11:01, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> Any objections to me switching the rat build to use
>> maven-scm-publish-plugin for site generation and updating the
>> documentation?
>
> No objections from me. Go ahead.
documented here:
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
feedback welcomed :-)
Robert
Re: Switch to maven-scm-publish-plugin [WAS Re: Maven SCM Publish
Plugin] ...?
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-11-18 11:01, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 11/17/12 21:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/11/17 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>>>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>>>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the
>>>>>>>> ASF
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself
>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Even if some tuning is still needed, the plugin seems an improvement
>>> to the
>>> process described in the current documentation[2].
>
> Any objections to me switching the rat build to use
> maven-scm-publish-plugin for site generation and updating the
> documentation?
No objections from me. Go ahead.
>
> Robert
--
Dennis Lundberg
Switch to maven-scm-publish-plugin [WAS Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin]
...?
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/17/12 21:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/11/17 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
<snip>
>>>>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
<snip>
>> Even if some tuning is still needed, the plugin seems an improvement to the
>> process described in the current documentation[2].
Any objections to me switching the rat build to use
maven-scm-publish-plugin for site generation and updating the documentation?
Robert
Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re:
[DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
2012/11/17 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
> On 11/15/12 22:03, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> 2012/11/15 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/12 21:46, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
>>>> and works fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've given it a spin, and it seems to work okay. Takes a while, but then
>>> so
>>> does CMS upload. There seem to be a lot of commit messages.
>>>
>>> Is this a known limitation, or am I doing something wrong...?
>>
>> no and no :-)
>
>
> :-)
>
>> javadoc files can be timestamped so recommitted again with site build
>> even if no real content change.
>> maven generated files too but only at day level whereas javadoc seconds
>> level.
>
>
> So... would setting notimestamp on the javadoc plugin be a good idea...?
Sure !
>
>
>
> Even if some tuning is still needed, the plugin seems an improvement to the
> process described in the current documentation[2]. Any objections to me
> switching the build and updating the document?
>
> Robert
> [1]
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html#notimestamp
> [2] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS]
Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/15/12 22:03, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/11/15 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>> On 11/06/12 21:46, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
>>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
>>>
>>> I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
>>> and works fine.
>>
>>
>> I've given it a spin, and it seems to work okay. Takes a while, but then so
>> does CMS upload. There seem to be a lot of commit messages.
>>
>> Is this a known limitation, or am I doing something wrong...?
> no and no :-)
:-)
> javadoc files can be timestamped so recommitted again with site build
> even if no real content change.
> maven generated files too but only at day level whereas javadoc seconds level.
So... would setting notimestamp on the javadoc plugin be a good idea...?
Even if some tuning is still needed, the plugin seems an improvement to
the process described in the current documentation[2]. Any objections to
me switching the build and updating the document?
Robert
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html#notimestamp
[2] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html
Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re:
[DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
2012/11/15 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
> On 11/06/12 21:46, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> 2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
>>
>> I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
>> and works fine.
>
>
> I've given it a spin, and it seems to work okay. Takes a while, but then so
> does CMS upload. There seem to be a lot of commit messages.
>
> Is this a known limitation, or am I doing something wrong...?
no and no :-)
javadoc files can be timestamped so recommitted again with site build
even if no real content change.
maven generated files too but only at day level whereas javadoc seconds level.
>
> Robert
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS]
Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/06/12 21:46, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
<snip>
>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>
>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>>
>>
>> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
> I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
> and works fine.
I've given it a spin, and it seems to work okay. Takes a while, but then
so does CMS upload. There seem to be a lot of commit messages.
Is this a known limitation, or am I doing something wrong...?
Robert
Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re:
[DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>:
> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> - We can probably do C as an exercise during the release, to bring it in
>>>> touch with reality
>>>
>>>
>>> What's the current state of play wrt Maven -> Apache CMS integration...?
>>
>>
>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>
>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>
>
> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
and works fine.
Let me know if you need some help on this part.
>
> Robert
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS]
Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
<snip>
>>> - We can probably do C as an exercise during the release, to bring it in
>>> touch with reality
>>
>> What's the current state of play wrt Maven -> Apache CMS integration...?
>
> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>
> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
Robert
Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven
to use the Rat plugin]
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>>
>> Yes, I think so. I have these things left on my todo list:
>>
>> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
>> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
>> they can be validated
>> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
>> incubator any more
>>
>> - Robert has assigned A to himself.
>
> I wrote some stuff at the weekend, but then accidentally deleted tonight
> (Doh!)
>
>> - I'll take care of B tonight.
>
> :-)
>
>> - We can probably do C as an exercise during the release, to bring it in
>> touch with reality
>
> What's the current state of play wrt Maven -> Apache CMS integration...?
There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the ASF new
svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
> Robert
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven
to use the Rat plugin]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
>
> Yes, I think so. I have these things left on my todo list:
>
> A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
> B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
> they can be validated
> C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
> incubator any more
>
> - Robert has assigned A to himself.
I wrote some stuff at the weekend, but then accidentally deleted tonight
(Doh!)
> - I'll take care of B tonight.
:-)
> - We can probably do C as an exercise during the release, to bring it in
> touch with reality
What's the current state of play wrt Maven -> Apache CMS integration...?
Robert
Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven
to use the Rat plugin]
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
On 2012-11-04 16:14, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> Hi
>
> (Just trying to pick up where we are on this...)
>
>> In RAT-78 there is a request to upgrade to a newer version of Doxia.
>> That is a reasonable request given the fact that the current version we
>> are using is 1.0-alpha-8 which is *really* old.
>
> +1
>
>> Now, in order to decide which version of Doxia to use we need to first
>> define the minimum version of Maven we want to support. Currently our
>> plugin requires Maven 2.0.6 which came out in 2007. Over in Maven land
>> we currently target Maven 2.2.1 as the minimum version for our plugins.
>>
>> The reason for this question is because different versions of Maven
>> comes with different versions of Doxia. This is an unfortunate hard
>> connection between the two, but starting with Maven 3 there are no
>> longer any direct dependencies on Doxia in Maven core. See this wiki
>> page for some history in the matter:
>>
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
>>
>> We really only have two choices:
>>
>> 1. Require Maven 2.0.11 and use Doxia 1.0.x
>>
>> 2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
>> technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
>>
>> Unless anyone has strong objections I plan on going with option 2 here.
>
> +1
>
> AIUI Dennis has applied [1] and [2] (thanks :-)
You're welcome :-)
> Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
Yes, I think so. I have these things left on my todo list:
A. Rewrite site for core module, which is now in JIRA as RAT-123
B. Add xml schema to assembly descriptors and site descriptors, so that
they can be validated
C. Rewrite src/site/apt/site-publish.apt, given that we're not in the
incubator any more
- Robert has assigned A to himself.
- I'll take care of B tonight.
- We can probably do C as an exercise during the release, to bring it in
touch with reality
> Robert
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-78
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-119
--
Dennis Lundberg
Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use
the Rat plugin]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/23/12 21:29, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
(Just trying to pick up where we are on this...)
> In RAT-78 there is a request to upgrade to a newer version of Doxia.
> That is a reasonable request given the fact that the current version we
> are using is 1.0-alpha-8 which is *really* old.
+1
> Now, in order to decide which version of Doxia to use we need to first
> define the minimum version of Maven we want to support. Currently our
> plugin requires Maven 2.0.6 which came out in 2007. Over in Maven land
> we currently target Maven 2.2.1 as the minimum version for our plugins.
>
> The reason for this question is because different versions of Maven
> comes with different versions of Doxia. This is an unfortunate hard
> connection between the two, but starting with Maven 3 there are no
> longer any direct dependencies on Doxia in Maven core. See this wiki
> page for some history in the matter:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
>
> We really only have two choices:
>
> 1. Require Maven 2.0.11 and use Doxia 1.0.x
>
> 2. Require Maven 2.1.0+, which in reality means Maven 2.2.1 due to
> technical reasons I won't go into here, and use Doxia 1.1+
>
> Unless anyone has strong objections I plan on going with option 2 here.
+1
AIUI Dennis has applied [1] and [2] (thanks :-)
Does it make sense to start working towards a new release...?
Robert
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-78
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-119