You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org> on 2010/09/14 14:11:46 UTC
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<el...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice
>> already ? (just wondering)
> But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar
> would be downloaded by running "mvn -Pdistribute install". Don't think
> that would be clear to users.
>
> So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among
> our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an
> informed choice by building it themselves.
So to be clear :
- the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no
serial code)
- the src package will contain the code of the serial project
I'm fine with that if nobody object.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Yeap sorry about that did not know how this happened.
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>.
Wrong mailing list?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<el...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice
>>> already ? (just wondering)
>>
>> But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar
>> would be downloaded by running "mvn -Pdistribute install". Don't think
>> that would be clear to users.
>>
>> So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among
>> our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an
>> informed choice by building it themselves.
>
> So to be clear :
> - the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no serial
> code)
> - the src package will contain the code of the serial project
>
> I'm fine with that if nobody object.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<el...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice
>>> already ? (just wondering)
>>>
>> But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar
>> would be downloaded by running "mvn -Pdistribute install". Don't think
>> that would be clear to users.
>>
>> So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among
>> our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an
>> informed choice by building it themselves.
>>
> So to be clear :
> - the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no serial
> code)
> - the src package will contain the code of the serial project
>
> I'm fine with that if nobody object.
>
>
FWIW there was some feature in Maven that conditionally downloads an
artifact after having the user approve the license. Perhaps we can take the
same steps for the rxtx.jar artifact?
Regards,
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu