You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Andy Noble <da...@hotmail.com> on 2002/01/29 16:52:12 UTC
Stupid Tiles Question
Sorry for this stupid tiles question, but I need to make sure I understand
this.
When I tried tiles, it appeared to severely affect performance. This seemed
to be because a new JSP was *constructed* on each request and then
*compiled* before finally being run, which then served up the HTML to the
client.
Is this correct? Is this performance hit the price to be paid for the
flexibility? Does this scale for thousands of users?
Thanks
Andy
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Stupid Tiles Question
Posted by Cedric Dumoulin <ce...@lifl.fr>.
Don't forget that each Tile is a jsp that need to be compiled at the first hit,
like all jsp. This happen normally only once when you change the jsp content.
After that, performances overhead is not significant. There should be something
wrong in your config.
Cedric
Andy Noble wrote:
> Sorry for this stupid tiles question, but I need to make sure I understand
> this.
>
> When I tried tiles, it appeared to severely affect performance. This seemed
> to be because a new JSP was *constructed* on each request and then
> *compiled* before finally being run, which then served up the HTML to the
> client.
>
> Is this correct? Is this performance hit the price to be paid for the
> flexibility? Does this scale for thousands of users?
>
> Thanks
> Andy
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Stupid Tiles Question
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I've noticed that the initial compile takes longer, but once the JSP is
compiled, the performance cost should dwindle. The best thing is to run
your own load tests, since a number of factors can affect performance
and scalabilty. It sounds like something else is wrong here.
Andy Noble wrote:
>
> Sorry for this stupid tiles question, but I need to make sure I understand
> this.
>
> When I tried tiles, it appeared to severely affect performance. This seemed
> to be because a new JSP was *constructed* on each request and then
> *compiled* before finally being run, which then served up the HTML to the
> client.
>
> Is this correct? Is this performance hit the price to be paid for the
> flexibility? Does this scale for thousands of users?
>
> Thanks
> Andy
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>