Re: [DISCUSS] General question regarding PIP comments

[Asaf Mesika <as...@gmail.com>]

Thanks, Enrico (sorry for replying late - I'm hugely backlogged on this
mailing list).

I wanted to contribute what you wrote in the Contributors guide, but I
couldn't find any reference to the process of PIP.  Do you know where it is
documented in the Pulsar website?




On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 5:07 PM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Asaf,
> good question!
>
> Il giorno gio 1 set 2022 alle ore 15:01 Asaf Mesika
> <as...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm fairly new to this project and I have seen 2 options to comment to a
> > PIP:
> > 1. In the GitHub issue.
> > 2. In the mailing list.
> >
> > I was wondering what is the best practice.
>
>
> In Apache projects we generally prefer discussions on the mailing
> list, because it is easier to let the community
> participate in the discussions.
>
> Unfortunately in order to follow a discussion on GH you must actively
> follow the notifications (hundreds of messages per day)
> or use any other means to stay up to date.
>
> So we generally keep "discussions" here.
>
> When you go down to implementation details it is better to work on the
> PR, as it is more productive.
> But for high level discussion it is better that they happen here
>
> Discussing on the GH issue of the PIP is misleading, and I agree with
> you that we should keep the discussions only in one place
>
> Enrico
>
> >
> > I know there is an ongoing initiative at the moment to switch a PIP to
> > become a file and actually a PR for submitting it. I guess the question
> > also applies to this new scheme :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Asaf
>

Re: [DISCUSS] General question regarding PIP comments

[tison <wa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Asaf,

Currently, the dev docs about PIP are located at:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/wiki/proposals

I'm writing the contribute guide at: https://pulsar.apache.org/contributing
... but the PIP process update should go through more discussion so I don't
cover it yet.

Best,
tison.


Asaf Mesika <as...@gmail.com> 于2022年11月8日周二 22:01写道：

> Thanks, Enrico (sorry for replying late - I'm hugely backlogged on this
> mailing list).
>
> I wanted to contribute what you wrote in the Contributors guide, but I
> couldn't find any reference to the process of PIP.  Do you know where it is
> documented in the Pulsar website?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 5:07 PM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Asaf,
> > good question!
> >
> > Il giorno gio 1 set 2022 alle ore 15:01 Asaf Mesika
> > <as...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm fairly new to this project and I have seen 2 options to comment to
> a
> > > PIP:
> > > 1. In the GitHub issue.
> > > 2. In the mailing list.
> > >
> > > I was wondering what is the best practice.
> >
> >
> > In Apache projects we generally prefer discussions on the mailing
> > list, because it is easier to let the community
> > participate in the discussions.
> >
> > Unfortunately in order to follow a discussion on GH you must actively
> > follow the notifications (hundreds of messages per day)
> > or use any other means to stay up to date.
> >
> > So we generally keep "discussions" here.
> >
> > When you go down to implementation details it is better to work on the
> > PR, as it is more productive.
> > But for high level discussion it is better that they happen here
> >
> > Discussing on the GH issue of the PIP is misleading, and I agree with
> > you that we should keep the discussions only in one place
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > >
> > > I know there is an ongoing initiative at the moment to switch a PIP to
> > > become a file and actually a PR for submitting it. I guess the question
> > > also applies to this new scheme :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Asaf
> >
>