Re: Dropping 0.20.x support?

[Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>]

>From the Amazon EMR page (http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/faqs/#dev-12):
Q: Which Hadoop versions does Amazon Elastic MapReduce support?
Amazon Elastic MapReduce supports 0.18.3, 0.20.2, and 0.20.205
versions of Hadoop with custom patches.

Is 0.20.205 support good enough for those running on EMR?


On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around.  But as soon as
> they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this.  Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox <cl...@rummble.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've just started playing with Giraph and also have the issue with
>> Eclipse and munging, though I've not looked deeply into if there is a
>> solution.
>>
>> I'm using 1.0.3 Hadoop locally but would also like to ensure Giraph says
>> compatible with AWS ElasticMapReduce which only uses 0.20.x Hadoop at
>> present.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:13 +0200, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>> Sebastian Schelter wrote:
>>> > AFAIK 0.20.x is the current stable version most people run on, so I
>>> > think it would not be a good idea...
>>>
>>> Are those 'most people' using Giraph too? Or, not?
>>> If they are, they should/could reply to this email and say so. :-)
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>> >
>>> > sebastian
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 06.06.2012 14:58, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> (perhaps, a stupid question but...) would it be a problem dropping Giraph
>>> >> support for Hadoop v0.20.x?
>>> >>
>>> >> If this is possible, it might be possible to simplify the all munging situation
>>> >> and even get rid of it, which would simplify the life for some of developers
>>> >> and/or users who might want to create and submit a patch using an IDE (such as
>>> >> Eclipse, for example).
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Paolo
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Re: Dropping 0.20.x support?

[Avery Ching <ac...@apache.org>]

I wonder if anyone is using 0.20.2 anymore, Facebook Hadoop is based on 
0.20.1, but has a mix of other stuff as well.

On 7/12/12 11:44 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>  From the Amazon EMR page (http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/faqs/#dev-12):
> Q: Which Hadoop versions does Amazon Elastic MapReduce support?
> Amazon Elastic MapReduce supports 0.18.3, 0.20.2, and 0.20.205
> versions of Hadoop with custom patches.
>
> Is 0.20.205 support good enough for those running on EMR?
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around.  But as soon as
>> they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this.  Thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox <cl...@rummble.com> wrote:
>>> I've just started playing with Giraph and also have the issue with
>>> Eclipse and munging, though I've not looked deeply into if there is a
>>> solution.
>>>
>>> I'm using 1.0.3 Hadoop locally but would also like to ensure Giraph says
>>> compatible with AWS ElasticMapReduce which only uses 0.20.x Hadoop at
>>> present.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:13 +0200, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>>> Sebastian Schelter wrote:
>>>>> AFAIK 0.20.x is the current stable version most people run on, so I
>>>>> think it would not be a good idea...
>>>> Are those 'most people' using Giraph too? Or, not?
>>>> If they are, they should/could reply to this email and say so. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>>>
>>>>> sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06.06.2012 14:58, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> (perhaps, a stupid question but...) would it be a problem dropping Giraph
>>>>>> support for Hadoop v0.20.x?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this is possible, it might be possible to simplify the all munging situation
>>>>>> and even get rid of it, which would simplify the life for some of developers
>>>>>> and/or users who might want to create and submit a patch using an IDE (such as
>>>>>> Eclipse, for example).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Paolo
>>>