You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/03 18:57:19 UTC
Re: Solr search
Hi,
Thanks to Upayavira ,Shawn Heisey, Uwe and Benson and appreciate them for
helping me providing necessary information.
I was trying to understand the usage and licensing of following files, for
using SOLR for our client project.
1. Tagsoup 1.2.1
2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13
3. com.googlecode.juniversalchardet v1.0.3
4. commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
5. xercesImpl : 2.9.1
@ Upayavira,
I was trying to understand the dual licensing on these files, but
your replies help me understand it better.
Thanks,
Vetrikkumaran Murugesan
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.solr.user/113392 -
was helpful
Thanks
2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
> jar files,
>
> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
>
>
> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
> valuable and appreciated.
>
>
> Why would you want to do that?
>
> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its
> configs without it. Seems kinda important.
>
> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code,
> therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation?
>
> Upayavira
>