Re: HELP NEEDED: Bindings changes for issue #3200

[Joe Swatosh <jo...@gmail.com>]

Hi Mike,

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> As part of issue #3200, I've done my best to get the various bindings back
> to the state they were in before I reworked the C API.  As far as I know,
> that means that with respect to support for custom revision properties
> provided at commit-time:
>
>   Python supports this via the client APIs in all places that the C API
>   does.
>
>   Ruby supports this via the client APIs in almost all the places that
>   the C API does.  I didn't know what to do with mkdir(), for the reasons
>   noted in the log message of r31249.
>
>   JavaHL compiles, but doesn't support this feature at all.  I don't
>   *think* that's my fault (and if it is, I'm sorry).  But if this isn't
>   the state we want to release those bindings in for 1.5.0, I need someone
>   else to undertake that change.  (See r31250 for a list of the
>   SVNClient.cpp functions that would need to grow a 'revPropTable'
>   parameter which is Java-ized and passed into the C API.)
>
>   Perl.  I don't know.  The Perl bindings almost appear to be unmaintained.
>   They build, and the tests pass, but as far as I know there's no support
>   for this feature.  Here again, I'm out of my element with this set
>   of bindings.
>
> So, if you're in the To: line of this mail, it means you appear per the last
> few revisions of one of these bindings collections to be the closest
> approximation of a maintainer thereof, and I need your help finishing what I
> started, unbreaking what I've broken, or adding a new feature before the
> 1.5.0 release because we overlooked it earlier.
>
> Please keep issue #3200 informed of your progress, and of course add
> relevant revisions to the r31243 block in /branches/1.5.x/STATUS.
>
> Thanks, all!
>

I'd like to help, but I am currently buried (like everyone else, I
know).  I'm also stuck trying to figure out why Paul's r30949 causes
two of the Ruby bindings test of merging to fail.  Everything looks
okay when I try to replicate from the command line.

Blah, blah, blah.  Can't promise anything except I'll look at it as I
have time available.

Just wanted to let you know that I wasn't ignoring you.
--
Joe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: HELP NEEDED: Bindings changes for issue #3200

[Kouhei Sutou <ko...@cozmixng.org>]

Hi,

In <ae...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: HELP NEEDED: Bindings changes for issue #3200" on Wed, 21 May 2008 08:44:05 -0700,
  "Joe Swatosh" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > As part of issue #3200, I've done my best to get the various bindings back
> > to the state they were in before I reworked the C API.  As far as I know,
> > that means that with respect to support for custom revision properties
> > provided at commit-time:
> >
> >   Ruby supports this via the client APIs in almost all the places that
> >   the C API does.  I didn't know what to do with mkdir(), for the reasons
> >   noted in the log message of r31249.

> I'd like to help, but I am currently buried (like everyone else, I
> know).  I'm also stuck trying to figure out why Paul's r30949 causes
> two of the Ruby bindings test of merging to fail.  Everything looks
> okay when I try to replicate from the command line.
> 
> Blah, blah, blah.  Can't promise anything except I'll look at it as I
> have time available.

I've done in r31348.


Thanks,
--
kou

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org