Re: [build-test] Notification subjects ( was Re: [continuum] SUSE lnx 1CPU gcc: classlib)

[Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>]

2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> I changed the subject line and kept the old one as an example.
>
> First, thanks for fixing.
>
> Second, can we agree on some standard format for the subject lines?
>
> I think that we need, first and foremost, something like we're getting
> from IBM via :
>
>   BUILD FAILURE ...
>   BUILD FIXED ...
>
> so that we can know if the failure was resolved.
>
> Also, given the diversity of platforms and tests, maybe something like :
>
>   BUILD FAILURE : linux - suse 9 - <test name>
>
>   BUILD FIXED : linux - suse 9

+1

and more details in the message body. E.g. currently I can't figure
out which VM was used

Thanks,
Mikhail


>
> Thoughts?
>
> geir
>
>
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > On 11/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> these are finally making it through.  Cool.  What changed?
> >
> >
> > The notifications format was switch from 'html' to 'txt'. Now the
> > apache.orgdoes not reject them :)
> >
> > Also, can you get "continuum" out of the subject line?  Continuum has
> >> nothing to do with our build-test system.
> >>
> >> Maybe
> >>
> >> "build-test alert" or something?
> >
> >
> > Done.
> > Thanks, Vladimir
> >
> >
> > geir
> >>
> >>
> >> nomail@intel.com wrote:
> >> > BUILD FAILED: Ant Error
> >> Message:/export/viv/trunk/cc/projects/classlib/trunk/build.xml:167: The
> >> following error occurred while executing this line:
> >> /export/viv/trunk/cc/projects/classlib/trunk/make/build-test.xml:133:
> >> There were test failures.
> >> > Date of build: 11/24/2006 15:29:48
> >> > Time to build: 111 minutes 42 seconds
> >> > Last changed: 11/24/2006 14:47:52
> >> > Last log entry: drlvm
> >> > Errors/Warnings:
> >> >                 (20680)
> >> >
> >> > Unit Tests:
> >> >         (18704)
> >> >
> >> > failure: testGetEncoded
> >> org.apache.harmony.security.tests.x509.tsp.TSTInfoTest
> >> > Unit Test Error Details:
> >> >               (1)
> >> >
> >> > Test: testGetEncodedClass:
> >> org.apache.harmony.security.tests.x509.tsp.TSTInfoTestjunit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
> >>
> >> Decoded genTime is incorrect expected:<Fri Nov 24 16:51:09 NOVT 2006> but
> >> was:<Fri Nov 24 16:51:09 NOVT 2006>
> >> >       at
> >> org.apache.harmony.security.tests.x509.tsp.TSTInfoTest.testGetEncoded(
> >> TSTInfoTest.java:75)
> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
> >> >
> >> > Modifications since last successful build:
> >> >
> >> >             (20)
> >> >
> >> > add cc-drlvm log20061124144752Lbuild.16 11/24/2006 14:47:52drlvm
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security/src/test/impl/java/org/apache/harmony/security/tests/provider/crypto/SHA1PRNG_SecureRandomTest.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 13:16:22 lower down probability of intermittent failure in the
> >> testsee also HARMONY-2284[classlib][drlvm][security] intermittent
> >> failures
> >> of security module tests
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/sampled/Mixer.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/sampled/Port.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/midi/VoiceStatus.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/sampled/FloatControl.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/sampled/Line.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/sound/src/main/java/javax/sound/sampled/ReverbType.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:26:52 mark not implemented methods to get more real JAPI
> >> results
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/x-net/src/main/java/javax/net/ServerSocketFactory.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:24:25 change exception messages to follow RI
> >> > modified
> >> mloenko
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/x-net/src/main/java/javax/net/SocketFactory.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 12:24:25 change exception messages to follow RI
> >> > modified
> >> liangyx
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/lang/ProcessBuilder.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 11:59:37 apply patch for HARMONY-2257 ([classlib][luni]should
> >> throw ClassCastException when get value with an non String parameter
> >> in env
> >> Map.)
> >> > modified
> >> liangyx
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/ProcessBuilderTest.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 11:59:37 apply patch for HARMONY-2257 ([classlib][luni]should
> >> throw ClassCastException when get value with an non String parameter
> >> in env
> >> Map.)
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/ProgressMonitor.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JMenu.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JTabbedPane.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JComboBox.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JMenuBar.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JSpinner.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > modified
> >> ndbeyer
> >> /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/javax/swing/JTree.java
> >>
> >> 11/24/2006 08:41:15 Cleanup* use NotImplementedExceptions* Add missing
> >> annotations* Add serialVersionUID fields* format code
> >> > add cc-drlvm log20061124081723Lbuild.15 11/24/2006 08:17:23drlvm
> >>
> >
>

Re: [build-test] Notification subjects ( was Re: [continuum] SUSE lnx 1CPU gcc: classlib)

[Alexei Zakharov <al...@gmail.com>]

+1 for having more info in subject. The test name or at least the name
of the module would be helpful.

Thanks,

2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
>
>
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > 2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> >> I changed the subject line and kept the old one as an example.
> >>
> >> First, thanks for fixing.
> >>
> >> Second, can we agree on some standard format for the subject lines?
> >>
> >> I think that we need, first and foremost, something like we're getting
> >> from IBM via :
> >>
> >>   BUILD FAILURE ...
> >>   BUILD FIXED ...
> >>
> >> so that we can know if the failure was resolved.
> >>
> >> Also, given the diversity of platforms and tests, maybe something like :
> >>
> >>   BUILD FAILURE : linux - suse 9 - <test name>
> >>
> >>   BUILD FIXED : linux - suse 9
> >
> > +1
> >
> > and more details in the message body. E.g. currently I can't figure
> > out which VM was used
>
> Would that be something for the subject line too?


-- 
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Re: [build-test] Notification subjects ( was Re: [continuum] SUSE lnx 1CPU gcc: classlib)

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>]

Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> 2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
>> I changed the subject line and kept the old one as an example.
>>
>> First, thanks for fixing.
>>
>> Second, can we agree on some standard format for the subject lines?
>>
>> I think that we need, first and foremost, something like we're getting
>> from IBM via :
>>
>>   BUILD FAILURE ...
>>   BUILD FIXED ...
>>
>> so that we can know if the failure was resolved.
>>
>> Also, given the diversity of platforms and tests, maybe something like :
>>
>>   BUILD FAILURE : linux - suse 9 - <test name>
>>
>>   BUILD FIXED : linux - suse 9
> 
> +1
> 
> and more details in the message body. E.g. currently I can't figure
> out which VM was used

Would that be something for the subject line too?

geir